The Greek cardiac magnetic resonance experience: a comparison with the EuroCMR Registry

We carried out an evaluation of Greek cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data in order to analyse the indications, safety, quality, and impact on management, in comparison with the EuroCMR registry.

A retrospective analysis was performed of Greek CMR data from patients referred from 6 Greek cardiac clinics to 6 different MRI units in Athens that offer CMR services. A total of 10,000 CMR examinations carried out from 1995 to 2010 were evaluated retrospectively and included in the study.

Fifty percent of patients underwent evaluation for thalassaemic syndromes. In the remaining 50%, the most important indications were: a) workup of myocarditis/cardiomyopathies (40%), b) assessment of viability (5%), and c) congenital heart disease (5%). Image quality was good in 75%, moderate in 15%, and inadequate in 10% of cases. Complications occurred in 0.02%, including allergic reactions, dyspnoea, and panic attack. No death or cardiac complication was observed during or due to CMR; however, stress testing was not used in any of the cases. In 65% of all CMR studies, the initial diagnosis made by a non SCMR-trained person had no impact on the patients' management and did not offer any diagnostic contribution to referral clinicians, discouraging them from referring for CMR again. However, after the re-evaluation performed by an SCMR-trained person, the results of the Greek CMR were capable of satisfying all imaging needs in a percentage of patients equivalent to that presented in the EuroCMR registry (83% vs. 86%, p=NS), so that no further non-invasive imaging procedures would be required after CMR.

Thalassaemia and myocarditis were the most frequent CMR indications in Greece. However, the lack of training according to SCMR guidelines lowers the diagnostic efficacy significantly and leads to under-use of the technique.