Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

8.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.8K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

975
975
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lysozyme revisited: evaluating models of a reference protein in structural biology.

Current research in structural biology·2026
Same author

Efficient acrylamide adduct formation suggests dual applications of ReAIV L-asparaginase.

Amino acids·2026
Same author

Stereochemical aspects of the nucleophilic attack in different classes of L-asparaginases.

IUCrJ·2026
Same author

New targets and procedures for validating the valence geometry of nucleic acid structures.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

How to mitigate the caveat emptor burden of human and machine users of the Protein Data Bank.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2026
Same author

Benzoic and salicylic acids inhibit β-substituted alanine synthase 4;1 in common bean.

Plant physiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

7.9K

On the propagation of errors.

Mariusz Jaskolski1

  • 1Center for Biocrystallographic Research, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|October 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Protein Data Bank (PDB) policy prioritizing initial ligand deposition over nomenclature rules is challenged. This study suggests improvements for ligand molecule representation in the PDB.

Keywords:
Protein Data Bankatom numberingchemical nomenclaturesmall-molecule ligands

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K
Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

7.9K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K
Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • The Protein Data Bank (PDB) is a crucial repository for structural data of biological macromolecules.
  • Ligand molecules are essential components in many biological processes and drug development.
  • Current PDB policies may lead to inconsistencies in ligand representation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the Protein Data Bank's policy regarding the deposition of small-molecule ligands.
  • To address issues arising from erroneous atom numbering in initial ligand depositions.
  • To propose recommendations for improving ligand nomenclature and representation within the PDB.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of PDB deposition policies and nomenclature guidelines.
  • Review of case studies involving small-molecule ligands with non-standard atom numbering.
  • Comparative analysis of ligand data across different structural databases.

Main Results:

  • The current PDB policy, where the first deposition sets a precedent regardless of accuracy, is shown to be problematic.
  • Erroneous atom numbering in initial depositions can propagate, causing confusion and hindering data usability.
  • Inconsistencies in ligand representation can impact downstream analyses and drug discovery efforts.

Conclusions:

  • The PDB's policy on ligand deposition requires revision to ensure data accuracy and consistency.
  • Implementing stricter validation checks for ligand atom numbering is recommended.
  • Adoption of standardized nomenclature and improved data curation practices will enhance the PDB's value.