Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physically validated mitral valve models for surgical simulation: Bridging anatomy, pathology, and practice.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

UNICORN for Native Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Bicuspid Aortic Valve.

JACC. Cardiovascular interventions·2026
Same author

Mitral reoperations, reimagined.

JTCVS structural and endovascular·2026
Same author

Mitral valve repair after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: Approach and strategies for success.

JTCVS techniques·2026
Same author

Sex-Related Outcome After Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With Perceval Plus: Results From a Global Registry and Meta-Regression.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Impact of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement on Liver and Kidney Function in a Real-World Population.

JACC. Heart failure·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
09:04

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg

Published on: November 19, 2019

7.6K

Endoscopic vessel harvesting: good or bad?

Gianluigi Bisleri1, Annalisa Moggi, Claudio Muneretto

  • 1Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Brescia Medical School, Brescia, Italy.

Current Opinion in Cardiology
|October 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Minimally invasive conduit harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers advantages like reduced complications and better cosmetics. Endoscopic techniques are safe and effective, not compromising graft quality or long-term outcomes.

More Related Videos

Heterotopic Hindlimb-to-Neck Transplantation in the Mouse: A Supermicrosurgical Model of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
06:40

Heterotopic Hindlimb-to-Neck Transplantation in the Mouse: A Supermicrosurgical Model of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Published on: April 10, 2026

105
Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
08:12

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels

Published on: May 26, 2023

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
09:04

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg

Published on: November 19, 2019

7.6K
Heterotopic Hindlimb-to-Neck Transplantation in the Mouse: A Supermicrosurgical Model of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
06:40

Heterotopic Hindlimb-to-Neck Transplantation in the Mouse: A Supermicrosurgical Model of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Published on: April 10, 2026

105
Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
08:12

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels

Published on: May 26, 2023

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Techniques
  • Vascular Grafting

Background:

  • Minimally invasive approaches for saphenous vein and radial artery procurement in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery have increased in popularity.
  • Conventional open harvesting methods carry risks of wound complications and significant patient discomfort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the safety and advantages of minimally invasive conduit harvesting in coronary surgery.
  • To evaluate the impact of endoscopic techniques on conduit quality and graft longevity.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of existing literature on minimally invasive versus conventional conduit harvesting.
  • Analysis of studies reporting on wound complications, pain, cosmetic outcomes, and graft patency.

Main Results:

  • Less invasive harvesting demonstrates lower wound complication rates, reduced pain, and improved cosmetic results compared to traditional methods.
  • Concerns exist regarding potential conduit damage with endoscopic harvesting, possibly affecting graft longevity.
  • The majority of evidence suggests minimally invasive approaches do not compromise conduit quality or lead to increased graft failure.

Conclusions:

  • Endoscopic conduit harvesting is a safe and effective procedure for CABG.
  • Minimally invasive techniques do not negatively impact mid-to-long-term graft patency or cardiac-related events.
  • Endoscopic harvesting should be considered the preferred method for saphenous vein and radial artery procurement, with ongoing advancements promising further improvements.