Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-functioning advanced GEP-NENs: a GRADE approach for evidence evaluation and recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) in collaboration with the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (ITANET).

ESMO open·2025

Same author

Infections in lung transplanted patients: A review.

Pulmonology·2022

Same author

Radical Resection in Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recurrence-Free Survival Rate and Definition of a Risk Score for Recurrence.

Annals of surgical oncology·2022

Same author

Tumor-non-tumor discrimination by a β<sup>-</sup> detector for Radio Guided Surgery on ex-vivo neuroendocrine tumors samples.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2020

Same author

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

The British journal of surgery·2019

Same author

Suprapubic approach for robotic complete mesocolic excision in right colectomy: Oncologic safety and short-term outcomes of an original technique.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2017

Same journal

Unexpected evolution of COVID-19 in a heart transplant patient with multimorbidity recently submitted to thoracic surgery.

Minerva chirurgica·2020

Same journal

Ongoing clinical trials on axillary management.

Minerva chirurgica·2020

Same journal

Axillary management after neoadjuvant treatment.

Minerva chirurgica·2020

Same journal

Axillary observation alone versus sentinel node biopsy: past, present and future perspectives.

Minerva chirurgica·2020

Same journal

Patient flow for the management of ostomy patients.

Minerva chirurgica·2020

Same journal

The management of "fragile" and suspected COVID-19 surgical patients during pandemic: an Italian single-center experience.

Minerva chirurgica·2020

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

Robotic colectomy: is it necessary?

E Bertani¹, A Chiappa, P Ubiali

¹Division of General and Laparoscopic Surgery European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy - emilio.bertani@ieo.it.

Minerva Chirurgica

|October 9, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Robotic surgery offers potential benefits in colorectal cancer treatment, including lower conversion rates and a shorter learning curve compared to laparoscopy. However, its role and long-term outcomes in colon cancer require further investigation through clinical trials.

More Related Videos

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Published on: July 14, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Robotic Taj Mahal Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Published on: July 14, 2022

Area of Science:

Minimally Invasive Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Colorectal Surgery

Background:

Laparoscopic surgery revolutionized colorectal cancer management over 20 years ago.
Robotic surgery is emerging as an alternative to laparoscopic and open procedures.
Robotic surgery presents advantages like reduced conversion rates and a shorter learning curve compared to laparoscopy.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the current role and define the undefined aspects of robotic surgery in colorectal cancer.
To compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted colectomy with laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer.
To explore the educational benefits of robotic surgery in surgical training.

Main Methods:

Review of emerging data and comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery in colon cancer.
Analysis of factors such as recovery, morbidity, and length of stay.
Consideration of long-term outcomes and the need for randomized controlled trials.

Main Results:

Robotic-assisted colectomy shows similar recovery advantages to laparoscopy but increases costs without clear morbidity or length-of-stay reductions.
The role of robotics in colorectal surgery, particularly in pelvic versus abdominal procedures, remains largely undefined.
Robotic surgery offers educational advantages, enabling resident participation through a double console.

Conclusions:

Further randomized controlled clinical trials are necessary to determine the long-term outcomes and establish definitive differences between laparoscopic and robotic colonic resections.
While robotic surgery shows promise, its cost-effectiveness and impact on overall patient outcomes in colon cancer require more robust evidence.
Robotic surgery presents unique educational opportunities for surgical trainees in colorectal procedures.