Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Long-term prognosis after revascularization therapy in patients with atherothrombotic stroke
Ugur Uygunoglu1, Gulcin Benbir, Baki Goksan
1Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Insights
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) showed similar long-term outcomes for stroke patients. Neither procedure demonstrated significant differences in morbidity or mortality, offering comparable treatment options.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Cardiology
Background:
- Guidelines recommend carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) for symptomatic carotid stenosis >70%.
- Evaluating clinical outcomes of CEA versus CAS is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing CEA and CAS.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of revascularization therapies for carotid stenosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 2369 stroke patients treated since 1996.
- Analysis of 92 patients who underwent revascularization (41 CEA, 42 CAS, 9 vertebral stenting).
- Follow-up for a mean of 50.2 months to evaluate recurrent stroke, TIA, myocardial infarction, and mortality.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in recurrent stroke, TIA, or cerebrovascular deaths between CEA and CAS.
- Higher incidence of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular deaths in the CAS group (not significant).
- Increased deaths from other diseases and non-fatal complications in the CEA group.
- Asymptomatic restenoses were more frequent in the CAS group.
Conclusions:
- No significant long-term discrepancies in morbidity or mortality were observed between CEA and CAS.
- Both CEA and CAS represent viable treatment options for selected patients with carotid stenosis.
- Further research may be needed to explore specific risk factors and long-term event rates.
Aim:
Many guidelines recommend carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis of greater than 70%, and carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative to CEA. In our study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients who underwent revascularizaton therapy.
Material And Methods:
We reviewed the files of 2369 patients with stroke followed in our cerebrovascular outpatient clinics since 1996.
Results:
92 patients were treated by revascularization therapy. A total of 41 patients had CEA, 42 patients had CAS, and 9 patients had vertebral artery stenting; and 77 patients were followed-up for a mean period of 50.2+42.7 months (6 to 168 months). Recurrent stroke or TIA and deaths due to cerebrovascular diseases were similar between CEA and CAS patients. Myocardial infarction (including silent MI) and deaths due to cardiovascular diseases were more common in CAS group, though not significant. The deaths due to other diseases and other non-fatal complications were significantly more common in CEA patients. On the other hand, restenoses - all of which were radiological findings but asymptomatic - were more common in the CAS group.
Conclusion:
In this study we disclosed neither morbidity nor mortality discrepancies in long term among the patients who were treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS).
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
