Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
The SAH Score: a comprehensive communication tool
Neeraj S Naval1, Robert G Kowalski2, Tiffany R Chang2
1Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Anesthesia Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Background:
The Hunt and Hess grade and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale are commonly used to predict mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Our objective was to improve the accuracy of mortality prediction compared with the aforementioned scales by creating the "SAH score."
Methods:
The aSAH database at our institution was analyzed for factors affecting in-hospital mortality using multiple logistic regression analysis. Scores were weighted based on relative risk of mortality after stratification of each of these variables. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was subdivided into groups of 3-4 (score = 1), 5-8 (score = 2), 9-13 (score = 3), and 14-15 (score = 4). Age was categorized into 4 subgroups: 18-49 (score = 1), 50-69 (score = 2), 70-79 (score = 3), and 80 years or more (score = 4). Medical comorbidities were subdivided into none (score = 1), 1 (score = 2), or 2 or more (score = 3).
Results:
In total, 1134 patients were included; all-cause SAH hospital mortality was 18.3%. Admission GCS, age, and medical comorbidities significantly affected mortality after multivariate analysis (P < .05). Summated scores ranged from 0 to 8 with escalating mortality at higher scores (0 = 2%, 1 = 6%, 2 = 8%, 3 = 15%, 4 = 30%, 5 = 58%, 6 = 79%, 7 = 87%, and 8 = 100%). Positive predictive value (PPV) for scores in the range 7-8 was 88.5%, whereas 6-8 was 83%. Negative predictive value (NPV) was 94% for range 0-2 and 92% for 0-3. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SAH score was .821 (good accuracy), compared with the WFNS scale (AUC .777, fair accuracy) and the Hunt and Hess grade (AUC .771, fair accuracy).
Conclusions:
The SAH score was found to be more accurate in predicting aSAH mortality compared with the Hunt and Hess grade and WFNS scale.
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Statistical Analysis System (SAS)
Applications: SAS finds applications in numerous fields, including healthcare for clinical trial analysis, finance for risk assessment, marketing for customer data analysis, and...
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...

