Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Testing increases suggestibility for narrative-based misinformation but reduces suggestibility for question-based
Jessica A LaPaglia1, Jason C K Chan
1Department of Psychology, Morningside College, 1501 Morningside Ave, Sioux City, IA, 51106, U.S.A.
Abstract:
A number of recent studies have found that recalling details of an event following its occurrence can increase people's suggestibility to later presented misinformation. However, several other studies have reported the opposite result, whereby earlier retrieval can reduce subsequent eyewitness suggestibility. In the present study, we investigated whether differences in the way misinformation is presented can modulate the effects of testing on suggestibility. Participants watched a video of a robbery and some were questioned about the event immediately afterwards. Later, participants were exposed to misinformation in a narrative (Experiment 1) or in questions (Experiment 2). Consistent with previous studies, we found that testing increased suggestibility when misinformation was presented via a narrative. Remarkably, when misinformation was presented in questions, testing decreased suggestibility.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Hindsight Biases
Confirmation Biases
Understanding Deception
Social Proof

