Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Sterile Pericarditis in Aachener Minipigs As a Model for Atrial Myopathy and Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: September 24, 2021
Remifentanil has a minimal direct effect on sinoatrial node pacemaker activity in the Guinea pig heart
Akiko Kojima1, Yuki Ito, Hirotoshi Kitagawa
1From the Departments of *Anesthesiology and †Physiology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Background:
Whereas remifentanil administration is associated with severe bradycardia, it has yet to be fully investigated whether the negative chronotropic action of remifentanil is mediated by its direct action on sinoatrial (SA) node pacemaker activity in the heart versus indirect results of enhanced vagal activity.
Methods:
We examined the effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on the spontaneous action potentials of guinea pig SA node cells at concentrations of 5, 10, 100, and 1000 nM using the amphotericin B-perforated whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Isolated guinea pig hearts were perfused in a Langendorff mode with 5, 10, 100, and 1000 nM remifentanil.
Results:
The spontaneous firing rate and diastolic depolarization rate (DDR) of the SA node action potentials were 189.1 ± 14.8 /min and 74.1 ± 2.9 mV/s (n = 8), respectively, under control conditions, and were not significantly affected by exposure to 5 nM (P = 1.0 for both spontaneous firing rate and DDR; n = 6), 10 nM (P = 0.62 for spontaneous firing rate, P = 0.99 for DDR; n = 6), or 100 nM (P = 0.23 for spontaneous firing rate, P = 0.38 for DDR; n = 6) remifentanil. However, 1000 nM remifentanil modestly but significantly decreased the spontaneous firing rate (P = 0.0087) and DDR (P = 0.0072, n = 6). Remifentanil did not affect the heart rate of isolated Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts at concentrations of 5 nM (P = 0.98), 10 nM (P = 0.35), or 100 nM (P = 0.24) but significantly reduced the heart rate at 1000 nM (P < 0.0001). Fentanyl did not affect the spontaneous firing rate and DDR at concentrations of 5 nM (P = 1.0 for both spontaneous firing rate and DDR) and 10 nM (P = 0.62 for spontaneous firing rate, P = 0.79 for DDR), but it significantly reduced both at 100 nM (P = 0.00038 for spontaneous firing rate, P = 0.0080 for DDR) and 1000 nM (P < 0.0001 for both spontaneous firing rate and DDR).
Conclusions:
Clinically relevant concentrations (nanomolar order concentrations) of remifentanil do not produce significant direct effects on intrinsic cardiac automaticity; thus, suggesting that remifentanil-induced bradycardia in the clinical setting is independent of its direct cardiac effects.
More Related Videos
07:03Implantation of hiPSC-derived Cardiac-muscle Patches after Myocardial Injury in a Guinea Pig Model
Published on: March 18, 2019
08:01Semi-Minimal Invasive Method to Induce Myocardial Infarction in Rats and the Assessment of Cardiac Function by an Isolated Working Heart System
Published on: June 11, 2020