Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The private versus the public psychiatric interview.

N E Zinberg

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |August 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Observation in psychiatric interviews, using audiovisual aids, alters therapist concentration and the unique social dynamics of therapy. The one-to-one setting can shift towards a group dynamic, engaging different psychological mechanisms.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Social policy: AIDS and intravenous drug use.

    Daedalus·1990
    Same author

    From theory to practice: the planned treatment of drug users. Interview by Stanley Einstein.

    The International journal of the addictions·1990
    Same author

    Supervision and privacy in psychotherapy training.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1988
    Same author

    Elements of the private therapeutic interview.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1987
    Same author

    Controlling intoxicant use.

    Journal of psychoactive drugs·1984
    Same author

    Further comments on the role of psychiatry.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1983

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Psychology
    • Medical Education

    Background:

    • Increasing use of audiovisual aids (e.g., videotaping, one-way screens) in psychiatric teaching and research.
    • The need to understand the impact of observation on the private psychiatric interview.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define the differences between public and private psychiatric interviews.
    • To explore how observation affects the therapist and the therapeutic setting.
    • To analyze the psychological shifts in one-to-one versus group-like observational situations.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review on the effects of observation in psychiatric settings.
    • Description of personal experiences in various observational scenarios.
    • Analysis of how observation influences therapist concentration and the social uniqueness of the interview.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Observation can alter therapist concentration and the social uniqueness of the therapeutic encounter.
    • The presence of an audience transforms the one-to-one interview into a more group-like situation.
    • Different psychological mechanisms may be activated in observed versus private interviews.

    Conclusions:

    • The observation of psychiatric interviews introduces significant changes to the therapeutic process.
    • Understanding these changes is crucial for effective teaching and research in psychiatry.
    • The dynamics of observed interviews necessitate consideration of altered psychological mechanisms.