Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

360
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
360
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

1.3K
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
1.3K
Internal Loadings in Structural Members: Problem Solving01:28

Internal Loadings in Structural Members: Problem Solving

1.7K
When designing or analyzing a structural member, it is important to consider the internal loadings developed within the member. These internal loadings include normal force, shear force, and bending moment. Engineers can ensure that the structural member can support the applied external forces by calculating these internal loadings.
To illustrate this, let's consider a beam OC of 5 kN, inclined at an angle of 53.13° with the horizontal and supported at both ends. Determine the internal...
1.7K
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models01:17

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models

369
Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
369
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I01:25

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I

2.8K
A model is a theoretical way to understand a concept or an idea. Models can overcome barriers to health regardless of diverse economic and cultural backgrounds. In addition, models make the task easier by providing different ways to approach complex issues. There are two major health promotion models: the health belief model and the health promotion model.
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
2.8K
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

589
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
589

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of whole-body vibration exposures among dumper operators in iron ore mines: a comparative investigation of haul truck activity.

Ergonomics·2025
Same author

Fracture Initiation Pressure as a Measure of Cemented Paste Backfill Strength.

Mining, metallurgy & exploration·2025
Same author

Understanding Human Behaviors and Injury Factors in Underground Mines using Data Analytics.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

11.8K

Development of uncertainty-based work injury model using Bayesian structural equation modelling.

Snehamoy Chatterjee1

  • 1a Department of Mining Engineering , National Institute of Technology Rourkela , Orissa - 769008 , India.

International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
|October 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian structural equation model (SEM) to analyze miners' work injury in Indian coal mines. Expert-informed priors significantly improve model accuracy compared to fixed priors, enhancing safety analysis.

Keywords:
Bayesian modellingcoal mineshuman factorsinjurymultivariate statistics

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

11.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Mining Engineering

Background:

  • Miners' work injury poses significant risks in underground coal mines.
  • Accurate modeling of work injury is crucial for implementing effective safety measures.
  • Traditional SEM methods may not fully capture the complexities of injury causation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a Bayesian structural equation model (SEM) for analyzing miners' work injury in an Indian underground coal mine.
  • To compare the performance of expert-opinion-based priors versus fixed priors in Bayesian SEM for work injury.
  • To identify key environmental and behavioral variables influencing work injury.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a Bayesian structural equation model (SEM) incorporating environmental and behavioral variables.
  • Employed two approaches for prior distributions: fixed distributions and expert opinions.
  • Utilized Bayesian inference and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling (Gibbs sampling) to obtain posterior distributions.
  • Evaluated model fit using coefficient of determination and mean squared error.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian SEM with expert-opinion-based priors showed all structural and measurement model coefficients were statistically significant.
  • Fixed prior distributions resulted in two non-significant coefficients.
  • The Bayesian structural model demonstrated a good fit for work injury data (R-squared = 0.91) with lower mean squared error than traditional SEM.

Conclusions:

  • Expert-opinion-based priors enhance the statistical significance and reliability of Bayesian SEM for analyzing miners' work injury.
  • The proposed Bayesian SEM offers a more accurate and robust approach to understanding and mitigating work injury risks in mining environments.
  • This methodology provides valuable insights for improving safety protocols in underground coal mines.