Disease progression by infecting HIV-1 subtype in a seroconverter cohort in sub-Saharan Africa
Pauli N Amornkul1, Etienne Karita, Anatoli Kamali
1aInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, New York, USA bProject San Francisco, Kigali, Rwanda cMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Unit, Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda dBiostatistics Consultant, Arlington, Virginia, USA eCentre for Geographic Medicine-Coast/Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kilifi, Kenya fUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK gZambia-Emory HIV Research Project, Lusaka, Zambia hKenya AIDS Vaccine Initiative, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya iAurum Institute, Rustenburg jDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa kEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA lIAVI Human Immunology Laboratory, Imperial College, London, UK.
Objective:
To describe immunologic, virologic, and clinical HIV disease progression by HIV-1 subtype among Africans with well documented estimated dates of HIV infection (EDIs).
Design:
Prospective cohort.
Methods:
Adults and youth with documented HIV-1 infection in the past 12 months were recruited from seroincidence cohorts in East and Southern Africa and followed at 3-6 month intervals. Blood for lymphocyte subset and viral load determination was collected at each visit. Pol was sequenced from the first positive specimen to ascertain subtype. Preantiretroviral therapy disease progression was measured by three time-to-event endpoints: CD4 cell count 350 cells/microl or less, viral load measurement at least 1 × 10 copies/ml, and clinical AIDS.
Results:
From 2006 to 2011, 615 participants were enrolled at nine research centers in Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia; 579 (94.1%) had viral subtyping completed. Predominant subtypes were C (256, 44.2%), A (209, 36.1%), and D (84, 14.5%). After adjustment for age, sex, and human leukocyte antigen alleles in Cox regression analyses, subtype C-infected participants progressed faster than subtype A to all three endpoints [CD4 hazard ratio 1.60, 95% (confidence interval) CI 1.16, 2.20; viral load hazard ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.12, 2.25; and AIDS hazard ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.11, 2.31). Subtype D-infected participants reached high viral load more rapidly (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.01, 2.57) and progressed nearly twice as fast to AIDS compared to subtype A (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% CI 1.21, 3.09).
Conclusion:
Subtype-specific differences in HIV disease progression suggest that the local subtype distribution be considered when planning HIV programs and designing and defining clinical endpoints for HIV prevention trials.
More Related Videos
07:39An In vitro Co-infection Model to Study Plasmodium falciparum-HIV-1 Interactions in Human Primary Monocyte-derived Immune Cells
Published on: August 15, 2012
14:23A Restriction Enzyme Based Cloning Method to Assess the In vitro Replication Capacity of HIV-1 Subtype C Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
Published on: August 31, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency...
