Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Contingency Table

Contingency Table

A contingency table provides a way of portraying data that can facilitate calculating probabilities. It is a method of displaying a frequency distribution as a table with rows and columns to show how two variables may be dependent (contingent) upon each other; The table helps determine conditional probabilities quite quickly and can help systematically organize, analyze and quantify data. The table displays sample values concerning two variables that may be dependent or contingent on one...

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...

Introduction to Test of Independence

Introduction to Test of Independence

In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

Determination of Expected Frequency

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Project ImPACT Reduces Social Hyporesponsiveness and Translates to More Optimal Expressive Language Outcomes in Some Infants at Increased Likelihood of Autism.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2025

Same author

The Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) System in Toddlers With Early Indicators of Autism: Test-Retest Reliability and Convergent Validity With Clinical Language Assessments.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2025

Same author

How Does Sleep Deprivation Functionally Impact the Challenging Behavior of People With Intellectual Disabilities? A Systematic Review.

Behavior modification·2025

Same author

Getting to the Point: Examining Associations Between Adult Interactional Strategies and Infant Gestures.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2024

Same author

Are Function-Based Interventions for Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders Trauma Informed? A Systematic Review.

Behavior analysis in practice·2024

Same author

The Nonconcurrent Multiple-Baseline Design: It is What it is and Not Something Else.

Perspectives on behavior science·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Quantifying contingent relations from direct observation data: transitional probability comparisons versus Yule's Q.

Blair P Lloyd¹, Craig H Kennedy, Paul J Yoder

¹VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

|October 12, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares two methods for measuring behavioral contingencies using transitional probabilities against Yule's Q statistic. Findings help determine the most appropriate method for quantifying sequential associations in natural settings.

Keywords:

Yule's Q contingency descriptive analysis sequential analysis transitional probability

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Area of Science:

Behavior Analysis
Psychology
Statistics

Background:

Behavior analysis quantifies response-stimulus contingencies using transitional probability comparisons.
Yule's Q is a widely used statistic for sequential associations in and outside behavior analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify and compare two transitional probability methods for estimating contingencies in natural settings.
To evaluate the relationship between these methods and the established Yule's Q statistic.
To provide recommendations on the most suitable method for measuring behavioral contingencies.

Main Methods:

Identification of two transitional probability comparison methods from behavior-analytic literature.
Comparison of these methods with Yule's Q statistic.
Evaluation of the relationships between the indices derived from each method.

Main Results:

The study details the advantages and disadvantages of each transitional probability method.
It establishes the relationships between the two methods and Yule's Q.
Recommendations are made regarding the optimal method for contingency measurement.

Conclusions:

The paper offers a comparative analysis of different statistical approaches to measuring behavioral contingencies.
It guides researchers in selecting the most appropriate method for their specific research needs in naturalistic settings.