Economic evaluation of neonatal care packages in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Sylhet, Bangladesh

Amnesty E LeFevre1, Samuel D Shillcutt, Hugh R Waters

  • 1Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Suite E-8139, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21205, United States of America (USA).

Insights

The home-care package significantly reduced neonatal deaths, proving highly cost-effective for improving infant survival. Community care strategies did not demonstrate similar benefits in Bangladesh.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Health Economics
  • Neonatal Medicine

Background:

  • Neonatal mortality remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in low-resource settings.
  • Effective and affordable interventions are crucial for reducing preventable newborn deaths.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of two neonatal care strategies: home care and community care.
  • To evaluate these strategies against existing maternal and neonatal care services in Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Main Methods:

  • A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted.
  • Economic costs were assessed from a societal perspective, including program, provider, and household costs.
  • Neonatal mortality was determined via household surveys, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated.

Main Results:

  • The home-care package demonstrated significant cost-effectiveness, averting neonatal deaths at US$2939 and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) at US$103.49.
  • The home-care strategy was cost-effective with 95% certainty if healthy life years were valued above US$214 per DALY.
  • The community-care strategy did not reduce neonatal mortality and was not found to be cost-effective.

Conclusions:

  • The home-care package is a highly cost-effective intervention for neonatal care.
  • This strategy shows potential for replication and scale-up in similar settings globally.
Abstract