Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

08:01
Spectral and Angle-Resolved Magneto-Optical Characterization of Photonic Nanostructures
Published on: November 21, 2019
6.6K
Collective spin Hall effect for electron-hole gratings.
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
Physical Review Letters
|October 15, 2013
Summary
An electric field creates a spin grating in a GaAs quantum well through the collective spin Hall effect. This effect generates spin density with rich dynamics, including helical spin gratings.
Area of Science:
- Condensed matter physics
- Quantum mechanics
- Materials science
Background:
- Electron-hole gratings in quantum wells are crucial for optoelectronic devices.
- The electronic spin Hall effect (SHE) is a key phenomenon in spintronics.
- Understanding spin-charge coupling is vital for advanced quantum technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the generation of spin gratings via the electronic spin Hall effect in GaAs quantum wells.
- To explore the phenomenon termed the "collective spin Hall effect" (CSHE).
- To analyze the coupled spin-charge dynamics and their influence on spin density evolution.
Main Methods:
- Applying an electric field parallel to the wave fronts of an electron-hole grating.
- Utilizing a GaAs quantum well as the experimental system.
- Conducting a detailed study of coupled spin-charge dynamics in quantum wells with varying growth directions.
Main Results:
- An electric field parallel to the wave fronts induces a spin grating with the same wave vector.
- The amplitude of the induced spin grating can exceed 1% of the initial density grating.
- Observed rich features in spin density time evolution, including the generation of helical spin gratings.
Conclusions:
- The collective spin Hall effect provides a novel mechanism for generating spin gratings.
- The findings offer insights into controlling spin density in quantum wells.
- The potential for generating helical spin gratings opens new avenues for spintronic applications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Hall Effect
5.2K
Edwin H. Hall, in the year 1879, devised an experiment that could be used to identify the polarity of the predominant charge carriers in a conducting material. From a historical perspective, this experiment was the first to demonstrate that the charge carriers in most metals are negative.
5.2K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.2K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.2K
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
51.8K
The arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom is called its electron configuration. We describe an electron configuration with a symbol that contains three pieces of information:
51.8K
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
1.5K
An applied magnetic field causes loosely bound π-electrons in organic molecules to circulate, producing a local or induced diamagnetic field over a large spatial volume. As the molecules tumble in solution, the field generated by π-electrons in spherical substituents results in a zero net field. However, the net field generated by π-electrons in non-spherical substituents is not zero. The effect of this induced field depends on the orientation of the molecule with respect to B0,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.5K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.2K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.2K

