Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Hemodynamic Precision in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit using Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography
Published on: January 27, 2023
Blood pressure variability and left ventricular mass index in children
Bojko Bjelakovic1, Stevo Lukic, Vladislav Vukomanovic
1Clinic of Pediatrics, Clinical Center, Nis, Serbia; Medical Faculty, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia.
Insights
Blood pressure variability indices are not reliable for identifying children at risk for left ventricular hypertrophy. Body mass index is a more significant predictor of left ventricular mass index in pediatric hypertension.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Blood pressure variability (BPV) implications on subclinical organ damage in children remain unclear.
- Standard and novel BPV indices require evaluation for predicting left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in pediatric hypertension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical utility of weighted standard deviation (wBPSD) and real average variability (ARV) for identifying children at risk for LVH.
- To compare these novel BPV indices with standard ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiography was used to estimate left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in 67 children with suspected hypertension.
- Analysis included correlation and regression models using 24-hour wBPSD, 24-hour ARV, average 24-hour systolic blood pressure (SBP), and 24-hour SBP load.
Main Results:
- A significant positive correlation was found between 24-hour wBPSD and LVMI (ρ=0.389; P=.002).
- No correlation was observed between 24-hour ARV and LVMI (P>.05).
- After adjusting for body mass index (BMI), the correlation between 24-hour wBPSD and LVMI became weak (ρ=0.3; P=.022), and BMI emerged as the only significant independent predictor of LVMI (P=.028).
Conclusions:
- Current BPV indices, including 24-hour wBPSD and 24-hour ARV, are not clinically reliable for identifying children at risk for LVH.
- The association of wBPSD with LVMI is negligible and primarily influenced by BMI.
- Further research is needed to identify reliable BPV markers for subclinical organ damage in pediatric hypertension.
Abstract:
Clinical implications of blood pressure variability (BPV) on subclinical organ damage in children are unknown. The authors sought to explore the potential utility of two newly derived BPV indices: weighted standard deviation (wBPSD) and real average variability (ARV), as well as two standard ambulatory blood pressure indices: average 24-hour systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 24-hour SBP load, to identify children at high risk for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH). The study group consisted of 67 consecutive children who were referred to our institution for evaluation of suspected hypertension. LV mass was estimated by M-mode echocardiography using Devereux's formula according to the Penn convention and indexed for height(2.7) . We found a statistically significant, positive correlation between 24-hour wBPSD and LV mass index (LVMI) (ρ=0.389; P=.002) and no correlation between 24-hour ARV and LVMI (P>.05). However, partial correlation analysis of 24-hour wBPSD adjusted for body mass index (BMI) and LVMI showed only a weak correlation (ρ=0.3; P=.022). By using multiple linear regression analysis in a model with LVMI as a dependent variable and 24-hour wBPSD, 24-hour ARV, and BMI as independent variables, only BMI showed statistically significant independent positive associations with LVMI (P=.028). Results of our study showed that currently used BPV indices (24-hour wBPSD and 24-hour ARV) are not clinically reliable parameters to identify children at risk for LVH. Apparent contribution of the 24-hour wBPSD parameter to LVMI is negligible and is secondary to its close correlation with BMI (ρ=0.335 P=.009).
More Related Videos
06:04Author Spotlight: Establishment and Confirmation of a Postnatal Right Ventricular Volume Overload Mouse Model
Published on: June 9, 2023
12:12Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure