Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review
Mathieu Contrepois1, Arnaud Soenen, Michel Bartala
1Instructor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France.
Statement Of Problem:
After the development of a variety of ceramic restorative systems over the past 20 years, the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses has undergone considerable change. Esthetics and resistance to fracture are two of the main determinants of the success of a restoration; the third is marginal adaptation. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature dedicated to the marginal accuracy of ceramic systems is indicated.
Purpose:
This study reviewed the current scientific literature that pertains to the marginal fit of ceramic crowns fabricated with different systems and investigated the factors that influence marginal adaptation.
Material And Methods:
An electronic search was completed by using the PubMed and Scopus databases with the following combination of key words: (discrepancy or fit or gaps or adaptation) and (disilicate or ceramic) and (copings or crowns). The search was limited to English-language peer-reviewed articles published before April 15, 2012. Titles and abstracts were read to identify articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria designed for this review.
Results:
Of 469 studies identified, 54 satisfied the selection criteria and were included in this review. All were published between 1994 and 2012. A total of 17 ceramic systems were tested in 48 in vitro and 6 in vivo studies. Of all the marginal gaps measured, 94.9% were in the range of clinical acceptability. Study heterogeneity made it impossible to conduct a proper meta-analysis of research findings and to compare and rank the various systems in terms of marginal fit. Four parameters were found to influence marginal adaptation: finish line configuration, value of the predefined cementing space, veneering process, and cementation.
Conclusions:
The systems evaluated in the selected articles generally provide a clinically acceptable marginal fit. The current state of research does not allow for a proper comparison of the various systems in terms of marginal fit. The use of computer x-ray microtomography is recommended for further research on marginal adaptation.
