Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
[Assessment of prognostic and influencing factors in elderly patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome]
Kun Xiao1, Chao Guo, Long-xiang Su
1Department of Respiratory Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Objective:
To preliminarily assess the prognosis of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODSE) and analyze their influencing factors.
Methods:
The clinical data of 365 MODSE patients admitted into Chinese PLA General Hospital during January 2009 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. According to 28-day outcomes, they were divided into 2 groups (28-day survival and non-survival) while 4 groups according to age. Then these prognosis were evaluated with the current scoring systems ((acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHEII and III), sample acute physiological score (SAPSII) and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS)). The predictive powers were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Finally a binary Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relevant influencing prognostic factors of MODSE.
Results:
The mean age was (77.8 ± 9.1) years, mean number of failed organs (3.6 ± 1.2) and a 28-day mortality 45.8%. The ages of non-survival group were older than those of survival group ((78.1 ± 9.1) vs (76.7 ± 11.0) years). The number of organ failures ((4.3 ± 1.1) vs (3.1 ± 1.0)) and scores (APACHEII: (28 ± 7) vs (20 ± 8), APACHE III: (106 ± 27) vs (75 ± 31), SAPSII: (64 ± 16) vs (46 ± 18), MODS: (9 ± 3) vs (6 ± 3)) of non-survivals were significantly higher than that of survivals. The area under ROC curve of these four score systems were 0.790, 0.781, 0.780 and 0.780 respectively. Compared to the above systems, SAPSII had the best performance in sensitivity while APACHEII was more valuable in specificity. All clinical data underwent binary Logistic regression and the results showed that plasma concentration of albumin and mean arterial pressure (MAP) offered beneficial outcomes while age and number of organ failures had unfavorable prognosis. The greater patient age, the higher their mortality.
Conclusions:
All four scoring systems have accurate prognostic predictions of MODSE patients. And the predictive power of APACHEII is the best. Plasma concentration of albumin, MAP, age and organ failure number are independent prognostic factors in MODSE patients.
Insights
Prognostic scoring systems accurately predict outcomes for patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODSE). Higher patient age and more organ failures indicate a worse prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Prognostic Factor Analysis
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Context:
- Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODSE) presents a significant challenge in critical care.
- Accurate prognosis is crucial for patient management and resource allocation.
- Existing scoring systems require validation for diverse patient populations.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of four scoring systems (APACHE II, APACHE III, SAPSII, MODS) in MODSE patients.
- To identify independent factors influencing the 28-day survival of MODSE patients.
- To compare the predictive performance of different scoring systems.
Summary:
- Retrospective analysis of 365 MODSE patients revealed a 28-day mortality of 45.8%.
- Older age, increased number of organ failures, and higher scores across all evaluated systems (APACHE II, APACHE III, SAPSII, MODS) were associated with non-survival.
- Logistic regression identified plasma albumin concentration and mean arterial pressure (MAP) as favorable prognostic factors, while age and organ failure number were unfavorable.
Impact:
- All four scoring systems demonstrated accurate prognostic capabilities for MODSE.
- The APACHE II system showed the best predictive power.
- Key independent prognostic factors include plasma albumin, MAP, patient age, and the number of organ failures, guiding clinical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion