Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

08:57
Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
Published on: June 17, 2018
16.9K
Danish surgeons' views on minimally invasive surgery
Hellen Edwards1, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen
1Department of Surgery K, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark .
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A
|October 18, 2013
Summary
Danish surgeons prioritize complication risk and recovery time over cosmesis for minimally invasive surgery like single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES). Further investigation is needed before widespread adoption.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Innovation
- Laparoscopic Techniques
Background:
- Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) are gaining popularity due to potential benefits like improved cosmesis and faster recovery.
- Surgeons' attitudes toward these novel minimally invasive techniques are crucial for their adoption and integration into standard surgical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the attitudes of Danish surgeons regarding single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES).
- To understand the factors influencing surgeons' preferences and willingness to adopt these advanced minimally invasive procedures.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire-based study was conducted among members of The Danish Society of Surgeons and The Danish Society of Young Surgeons.
- A 26-item questionnaire was electronically distributed to 1253 surgeons, with 352 (approximately 30%) completing the survey.
Main Results:
- Surgeons prioritize minimizing complication risk and ensuring short convalescence above cosmesis and local anesthesia options.
- If undergoing cholecystectomy, 35.5% would choose SILS and 14.5% would choose NOTES, assuming equal risk to traditional laparoscopy.
- Willingness to learn SILS and NOTES was 44.6% and 32.7% respectively, with higher interest among less experienced and more surgically active surgeons.
Conclusions:
- Risk of complications is a paramount concern for surgeons considering SILS and NOTES.
- Further research is essential to address and mitigate potential risks before establishing SILS and NOTES as standard surgical care.

