Newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry for glutaric aciduria type 1: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Johannes Pfeil, Stefan Listl, Georg F Hoffmann

  • 1Department of General Paediatrics, Division of Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Centre for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, Heidelberg 69120, Germany. peter.burgard@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Insights

Newborn screening for Glutaric aciduria type I (GA-I) is cost-effective. Early GA-I diagnosis via MS/MS screening saves lives and reduces healthcare costs, making it a valuable addition to existing newborn screening programs.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Genetics
  • Metabolic Disorders
  • Public Health Screening

Background:

  • Glutaric aciduria type I (GA-I) is a rare inherited metabolic disorder.
  • Limited newborn screening for GA-I exists despite its prognostic importance.
  • Data on the cost-effectiveness of GA-I newborn screening is scarce.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for GA-I using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS).
  • To compare GA-I screening against not including it in the MS/MS screening panel.
  • To provide data for healthcare decision-makers on the value of GA-I screening.

Main Methods:

  • A Markov model was developed to simulate clinical outcomes.
  • Simulations covered 20- and 70-year time horizons for screened and unscreened newborns.
  • Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (Monte Carlo simulation) determined cost-effectiveness.

Main Results:

  • GA-I screening averted 3.7 DALYs per 100,000 neonates over 20 years.
  • Approximately one life year was gained per 100,000 screened neonates.
  • The screening program resulted in savings of ~€30,682 per 100,000 neonates over 20 years.

Conclusions:

  • Extending MS/MS newborn screening with GA-I is a highly cost-effective diagnostic strategy.
  • This conclusion is based on conditions comparable to the German healthcare system.
  • The study supports the integration of GA-I screening into existing newborn screening programs.
Abstract