Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: May 29, 2015
Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized,
Lluís Mont1, Felipe Bisbal, Antonio Hernández-Madrid
1Unitat de Fibril·lació Auricular (UFA), Arrhythmia Section - Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona and Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), C/ Villarroel, 170, Barcelona, Catalonia 08036, Spain.
Insights
Catheter ablation (CA) is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This randomized trial demonstrated CA
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Interventions
Background:
- Catheter ablation (CA) is established as effective for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
- No prior randomized trials have compared CA with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) for persistent AF.
- Persistent AF presents unique challenges in rhythm management compared to paroxysmal AF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) in treating persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
- To evaluate the long-term efficacy of CA in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for managing persistent AF.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial comparing CA and ADT in patients with persistent AF (excluding long-standing cases).
- Primary endpoint: absence of AF or atrial flutter >24h after a 3-month blanking period, assessed at 12-month follow-up.
- Secondary endpoints included atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, hospitalizations, and need for electrical cardioversion.
Main Results:
- Catheter ablation (CA) demonstrated significantly higher efficacy, with 70.4% of patients free from the primary endpoint compared to 43.7% in the antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) group (P = 0.002).
- The proportion of patients free from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (>30s) was substantially higher in the CA group (60.2%) versus the ADT group (29.2%) (P < 0.001).
- Fewer patients required electrical cardioversion in the CA group (34.7%) compared to the ADT group (50%) (P = 0.018).
Conclusions:
- Catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation at 12-month follow-up.
- CA offers a more effective long-term rhythm control strategy for persistent AF compared to medical management.
- These findings support CA as a primary treatment option for selected patients with persistent AF.
Background:
Catheter ablation (CA) is a highly effective therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) when compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT). No randomized studies have compared the two strategies in persistent AF. The present randomized trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of CA vs. ADT in treating persistent AF.
Methods And Results:
Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to CA or ADT (excluding patients with long-standing persistent AF). Primary endpoint at 12-month follow-up was defined as any episode of AF or atrial flutter lasting >24 h that occurred after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints were any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 s, hospitalization, and electrical cardioversion. In total, 146 patients were included (aged 55 ± 9 years, 77% male). The ADT group received class Ic (43.8%) or class III drugs (56.3%). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 69 of 98 patients (70.4%) in the CA group and 21 of 48 patients (43.7%) in the ADT group were free of the primary endpoint (P = 0.002), implying an absolute risk difference of 26.6% (95% CI 10.0-43.3) in favour of CA. The proportion of patients free of any recurrence (>30 s) was higher in the CA group than in the ADT group (60.2 vs. 29.2%; P < 0.001) and cardioversion was less frequent (34.7 vs. 50%, respectively; P = 0.018).
Conclusion:
Catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF at 12-month follow-up.
Clinical Trial Registration Information:
NCT00863213 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00863213).
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...

