Pulsion intubation versus traction intubation for obstructing carcinomas of the esophagus

Eighty-eight patients were intubated to relieve the dysphagia of malignant esophageal obstruction. Because of advanced metastatic disease or poor general condition, 49 patients could not be operated on and were intubated endoscopically. Under radiographic control, the Nottingham Introducer was used to position Atkinson or modified Celestin tubes. In 39 other patients, palliative resection could not be done or liver metastasis was found at preliminary exploration with a view to esophagectomy. In these patients, Celestin tubes were inserted by the traction technique. The pulsion intubation group was older than the traction intubation group but comparable in other respects. Hospital stay was significantly shorter for the pulsion intubation group (8.4 versus 18.6 days). Hospital mortality rates were comparable (14.3% in the pulsion intubation group versus 23.1% in the traction intubation group), and survival did not differ (93 days in the pulsion intubation group versus 137 days in the traction intubation group). Overall complication rates were similar, but there were two significant differences: (1) wound infection or dehiscence was a major problem in the traction intubation group, occurring in 23% of the patients; and (2) tube obstruction or displacement occurred more frequently in the pulsion intubation group (18.3% versus 5.1%) but did not constitute a serious problem. Perforation occurred in 4 patients (8.2%) in the pulsion intubation group but was fatal in only 1. Pulsion intubation offers distinct advantages over traction intubation in that hospital stay is decreased and morbidity reduced.