Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

29.3K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
29.3K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

28.6K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
28.6K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.4K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

29.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
29.8K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

8.3K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diversity of microglial transcriptional responses during opioid exposure and neuropathic pain.

Pain·2024
Same author

Author Correction: Machine learning reveals bilateral distribution of somatic L1 insertions in human neurons and glia.

Nature neuroscience·2023
Same author

An RNA-sequencing transcriptome of the rodent Schwann cell response to peripheral nerve injury.

Journal of neuroinflammation·2022
Same author

Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes induce cell death via saturated lipids.

Nature·2021
Same author

Machine learning reveals bilateral distribution of somatic L1 insertions in human neurons and glia.

Nature neuroscience·2021
Same author

Knockout of reactive astrocyte activating factors slows disease progression in an ALS mouse model.

Nature communications·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.8K

How to pick a graduate advisor.

Ben A Barres1

  • 1Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Fairchild Building Room D235, 299 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5125, USA.

Neuron
|October 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Choosing a good scientific advisor is crucial for career success and innovation. This guide proposes an M-index to measure mentoring quality and calls for better support and recognition of mentors.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Higher Education
  • Mentorship

Background:

  • Effective mentorship is critical for scientific career progression and innovation.
  • Current university systems often lack robust training and evaluation for faculty mentorship.
  • The quality of mentorship significantly impacts trainee success and institutional health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a guide for scientists selecting graduate or postdoctoral advisors.
  • To advocate for improved faculty mentorship training and quality assurance.
  • To introduce a metric for evaluating mentoring effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework for advisor selection.
  • Proposal of a Mentorship Quality Index (M-index).
  • Literature review on mentorship best practices and challenges.

More Related Videos

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

7.5K
Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.8K
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

7.5K
Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.8K

Main Results:

  • A framework for evaluating potential advisors based on mentorship quality.
  • The proposed M-index offers a quantifiable measure of mentoring effectiveness.
  • Identified a need for systemic changes in rewarding and recognizing mentorship.

Conclusions:

  • Selecting the right mentor is a critical decision for young scientists.
  • Universities must prioritize and standardize mentorship training and evaluation.
  • Implementing metrics like the M-index can elevate mentoring standards and foster scientific innovation.