Commitment contracts and team incentives: a randomized controlled trial for smoking cessation in Thailand
Justin S White1, William H Dow, Suthat Rungruanghiranya
1Stanford University (White), Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, the University of California, Berkeley (Dow), School of Public Health, Berkeley, California.
A novel intervention combining monetary and social incentives significantly boosted smoking abstinence rates in rural Thailand. This cost-effective approach offers a viable alternative for tobacco dependence treatment in low-resource settings.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Behavioral Science
- Health Economics
Background:
- Tobacco dependence treatment is scarce in low-resource settings, particularly in developing nations.
- Limited access to smoking cessation interventions hinders public health efforts in rural communities.
- Developing effective and accessible smoking cessation strategies is crucial for global health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intervention using monetary and social incentives for smoking cessation.
- To assess the impact of commitment contracts and team incentives on smoking abstinence in rural Thailand.
- To determine the cost-effectiveness of this intervention compared to existing methods.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 201 adult smokers in rural Thailand.
- Participants were assigned to either a control group receiving counseling or an intervention group receiving counseling plus incentives and reminders.
- Biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months was the primary outcome measure.
Main Results:
- The intervention group achieved significantly higher abstinence rates: 46.2% at 3 months and 44.3% at 6 months, compared to 14.5% and 18.8% in the control group, respectively.
- Adjusted odds ratios indicated a substantial increase in abstinence favoring the intervention group (e.g., 4.2 at 6 months).
- The intervention's incremental cost per quitter was $281, significantly lower than nicotine gum or varenicline in Thailand.
Conclusions:
- The novel incentive-based intervention demonstrated a 91%-136% increase in smoking abstinence at 6 months compared to standard care.
- While treatment effects showed some tapering by 14 months, the intervention remains a promising, cost-effective option.
- This approach offers a viable and economically sound alternative for smoking cessation in resource-limited environments.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
04:24Acupoint Application as a Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment for Fatigue Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: September 5, 2025
