Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Cardiovascular outcomes during treatment with dabigatran: comprehensive analysis of individual subject data by
Andreas Clemens1, Mandy Fraessdorf, Jeffrey Friedman
1Corporate Division Medicine, TA Cardiovascular, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Insights
Dabigatran may have a higher risk of myocardial infarction compared to warfarin, but it shows a positive benefit-risk ratio for other cardiovascular events. These findings suggest myocardial infarction is not an adverse reaction to dabigatran.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily proved superior to warfarin in preventing stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (SPAF).
- A numerical increase in myocardial infarctions (MI) with dabigatran versus warfarin prompted further cardiovascular outcome analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively analyze cardiovascular outcomes, specifically MI, in Phase II and III trials of dabigatran etexilate.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dabigatran compared to warfarin, enoxaparin, and placebo across various indications.
Main Methods:
- Pooled analysis of individual patient data from 14 comparative trials (n=42,484) across five indications.
- Evaluation of cardiovascular events, including MI, comparing dabigatran against warfarin, enoxaparin, and placebo.
Main Results:
- Pooled analysis showed MI occurrence favored warfarin (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.88 for dabigatran 150 mg twice daily).
- A composite endpoint of MI, stroke, and vascular death was numerically lower with dabigatran 150 mg (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-1.00).
- Dabigatran demonstrated similar MI rates compared to enoxaparin and placebo.
Conclusions:
- Well-controlled warfarin may offer more MI protection than dabigatran, but not enoxaparin.
- Dabigatran exhibited a positive benefit-risk ratio for key cardiovascular composite endpoints.
- Myocardial infarction is unlikely to be an adverse drug reaction associated with dabigatran use.
Background:
Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was shown to be superior to warfarin in preventing stroke in subjects with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (SPAF) in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY) trial. Numerically, more myocardial infarctions occurred in patients receiving dabigatran compared with well-controlled warfarin. This observation prompted a comprehensive analysis of cardiovascular outcomes, including myocardial infarction, in all completed Phase II and III trials of dabigatran etexilate.
Methods:
The analysis included comparisons of dabigatran with warfarin, enoxaparin, and placebo. Data were analyzed for the occurrence of cardiovascular events from 14 comparative trials (n = 42,484) in five different indications. Individual study data were evaluated, as well as pooled subject-level data grouped by comparator.
Results:
In the pooled analysis of individual patient data comparing dabigatran with warfarin (SPAF and venous thromboembolism treatment indications), myocardial infarction occurrence favored warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.76 for dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.88 for dabigatran 150 mg twice daily). The clinically relevant composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, total stroke, and vascular death demonstrated numerically fewer events in dabigatran 150 mg patients (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-1.00), but was similar for dabigatran 110 mg (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.13). Dabigatran had similar myocardial infarction rates when compared with enoxaparin or placebo.
Conclusion:
These analyses suggest a more protective effect of well-controlled warfarin, but not enoxaparin, compared with dabigatran in preventing myocardial infarction in multiple clinical settings. Dabigatran showed an overall positive benefit-risk ratio for multiple clinically important cardiovascular composite endpoints in all evaluated clinical indications. In conclusion, these data suggest that myocardial infarction is not an adverse drug reaction associated with use of dabigatran.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...

