Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review system
Ronald L Eisenberg1, Meredith L Cunningham1, Bettina Siewert1
1Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Radiologists find value in peer review, but many feel the current process is a waste of time and suffers from selection bias. A new educational approach is needed to improve radiologist performance.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Education
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Peer review is a standard practice in radiology.
- Previous studies have not detailed radiologist opinions on the peer review process.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate radiologist opinions on various aspects of the peer review process.
- To assess perceptions of case selection, scoring, and impact on performance.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire was distributed to all radiology faculty.
- The survey assessed views on general peer review, case selection, scoring, and performance impact.
- A 96.2% response rate was achieved.
Main Results:
- 44% found the peer review system a waste of time; 58% believed it meets regulatory requirements.
- 46% agreed peer review improves performance; 32% believed it decreases medical errors.
- Significant minorities admitted to selecting easier cases or avoiding time-intensive ones, raising concerns about selection bias.
Conclusions:
- While nearly half see value, the current peer review system is perceived as inefficient.
- Selection bias in case review is a significant concern.
- A new, education-focused approach is recommended to enhance learning from mistakes.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation