Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A new stoma for an older person-An association with quality of life and physical function: A systematic review.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2022
Same author

The emperor still looks naked.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2018
Same author

Corrigendum: Assisted reproductive technologies to prevent human mitochondrial disease transmission.

Nature biotechnology·2018
Same author

Corrigendum: Assisted reproductive technologies to prevent human mitochondrial disease transmission.

Nature biotechnology·2018
Same author

Assisted reproductive technologies to prevent human mitochondrial disease transmission.

Nature biotechnology·2017
Same author

Implementation of a multicomponent intervention to optimise patient safety through improved oxygen prescription in a rural hospital.

The Australian journal of rural health·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
09:03

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

8.9K

Selecting the 'best' embryos: prospects for improvement.

Peter Braude1

  • 1Emeritus Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Women's Health, King's College, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.

Reproductive Biomedicine Online
|October 23, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Embryo selection for transfer is inadequate, risking multiple pregnancies. Improved methods are needed for selecting both embryos and responsible clinicians who prioritize patient counseling over demands.

Keywords:
IVFPGSembryo qualityevidence basemorphokineticsmultiple pregnancyresponsibility

More Related Videos

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification
10:59

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification

Published on: July 26, 2019

22.9K
Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts
09:35

Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts

Published on: March 2, 2017

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
09:03

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

8.9K
Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification
10:59

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification

Published on: July 26, 2019

22.9K
Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts
09:35

Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts

Published on: March 2, 2017

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Embryology
  • Clinical Practice

Background:

  • Embryo transfer is a critical step in assisted reproductive technology (ART).
  • Current practices for embryo selection and transfer numbers warrant critical evaluation.
  • The consequences of embryo selection methods impact pregnancy outcomes, particularly multiple gestations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the rationale and methods behind embryo selection for transfer.
  • To analyze the outcomes associated with current embryo transfer practices.
  • To identify areas for improvement in embryo selection and clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on embryo selection and transfer.
  • Analysis of evidence regarding the effectiveness and consequences of current methods.
  • Critical appraisal of clinical decision-making processes in ART.

Main Results:

  • Current embryo selection techniques lack sufficient evidential support and scrutiny.
  • Decisions on the number of embryos transferred should consider the probability of multiple pregnancies, not just the input number.
  • Existing methods for selecting embryos and clinicians are suboptimal.

Conclusions:

  • There is a need for more rigorous evidence supporting embryo selection methods.
  • Clinical decisions regarding embryo transfer numbers must prioritize reducing multiple pregnancies.
  • Enhanced methods for selecting both embryos and responsible clinicians are essential for improving ART outcomes.