Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity
Katarina Stingl1, Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Florian Gekeler
1Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|October 24, 2013
Summary
Subretinal visual implants restored some vision in blind patients. Subfoveal placement of these active microelectronic devices yielded significantly better results than parafoveal placement for hereditary retinal degeneration.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Hereditary retinal degenerations cause progressive vision loss.
- Current treatments are limited for end-stage retinal degeneration.
- Active microelectronic subretinal implants aim to restore photoreceptive function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of an active microelectronic subretinal implant in patients with end-stage retinal degeneration.
- To compare visual outcomes based on implant placement (subfoveal vs. parafoveal).
Main Methods:
- A pilot and clinical study involving 20 blind patients with hereditary retinal diseases.
- Surgical implantation of active visual devices in the subretinal space (8 subfoveal, 12 parafoveal).
- Masked, randomized testing of visual functions (light perception, localization, motion detection, grating acuity, Landolt C-rings) with implant ON and OFF.
Main Results:
- Three patients were excluded due to surgical/technical issues.
- Parafoveal placement: 80% light perception, 10% light localization, 10% grating acuity (0.33 cycles/degree). No motion or Landolt C-ring test success.
- Subfoveal placement: 100% light perception/localization, 75% motion detection (35°/s), 88% grating acuity (3.3 cycles/degree), 38% Landolt C-ring test success (20/546 visual acuity).
Conclusions:
- Subfoveal placement of active subretinal visual implants demonstrates superior functional outcomes.
- Implant location is critical for maximizing visual restoration in retinal degeneration patients.


