Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.1K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.1K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.5K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond the <i>FTO</i> Gene: Environmental and Behavioural Factors Associated with BMI and Overweight in Spanish Adolescents.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Flipped Classroom Enhances Physical Demands, Energy Cost, and Academic Performance on Nutrition Concepts in Secondary School.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same author

RF-EMF Exposure Assessment: Comparison of Measurements in Airports and Flights with and Without Wi-Fi Service.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Validation of the WIMU PRO<sup>TM</sup> Device for Jump Detection in Beach Volleyball: A Gender-Based Analysis during Official Competitions.

Journal of human kinetics·2025
Same author

Impact of Caffeine Intake on Female Basketball Players' Performance.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Beyond conventional characterization: Defect engineering role for sensitivity and selectivity of room-temperature UV-assisted graphene-based NO₂ sensors.

Talanta·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.0K

Clustering strategies for optimal trial selection in multisensor environments. An eigenvector based approach.

Alfonso de Hoyos1, Javier Portillo2, Pilar Marín3

  • 1Instituto de Magnetismo Aplicado, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, ADIF, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.

Journal of Neuroscience Methods
|October 26, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an automated clustering algorithm to clean magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, significantly improving brain source localization accuracy and reducing computational costs compared to manual methods and Independent Component Analysis (ICA).

Keywords:
ClusteringEigenvectorHigh-resolution spatial filteringLinear Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV)MagnetoencephalographySpatial beamforming

More Related Videos

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

6.3K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.0K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

6.3K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) data are frequently contaminated by artifacts from eye blinks and head movements.
  • These artifacts degrade the performance of source localization algorithms.
  • Manual trial selection and rejection are traditionally used to mitigate these artifacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an automatic trial selection and rejection algorithm for MEG data.
  • To improve the accuracy of brain source localization methods.
  • To reduce the computational cost associated with data cleaning.

Main Methods:

  • An automatic algorithm based on clustering techniques was developed for trial selection and rejection.
  • A dissimilarity measure based on the eigenvector of the covariance matrix was employed.
  • Clustered covariance matrices were averaged and used with the Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV) Beamformer.

Main Results:

  • The proposed clustering method demonstrated a marked improvement in the specificity of the LCMV source localization algorithm.
  • The results show superior performance compared to applying LCMV without prior data clustering.

Conclusions:

  • The developed clustering technique offers a significant reduction in computational cost compared to Independent Component Analysis (ICA).
  • This method provides an efficient and effective approach for cleaning MEG data.
  • The study proposes the integration of clustering techniques into brain activity localization algorithms.