Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
[Three major problems and solutions in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma]
Guo-le Lin1, Hui-zhong Qiu, Yi Xiao
1Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China. qiuhzpumch@163.com.
Objective:
To investigate the three major problems and solutions in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection(APR) for rectal carcinoma.
Methods:
A retrospective study of 60 low rectal carcinoma cases undergoing selective laparoscopic APR from September 2010 to May 2013 in our hospital was undertaken. A laparoscopic sigmoid stoma was performed through the extraperitoneal route at the left lower abdomen puncture point after lymphadenectomy and tumor excision during operation. Using the unique intracorporeal suture technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM), the pelvic peritoneum was closed by continuous suture with TEM needle-forceps and absorbable suture. Those patients with the successful pelvic peritoneum closure received continuous irrigation of presacral space from the third postoperative day to prevent perineal incision infection.
Results:
Only one patient (1.7%) was converted to laparotomy. Fifty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic APR and laparoscopic sigmoid stoma was successfully performed through the extraperitoneal route without abdominal incision, and the incidence of stoma complication was only 3.4%. Out of 59 patients undergoing laparoscopic APR, the pelvic peritoneum of 56 patients(94.9%) was closed successfully. The median time of closing the pelvic peritoneum was 15 min. Fifty-seven patients with pelvic peritoneum successfully closed by laparotomy or laparoscopic approach received continuous irrigation of presacral space and the median time of presacral drainage tube placement was 7.8 days. No patient developed postoperative intestinal obstruction. The rate of perineal wound healing in grade A, B and C was 87.7%, 8.8% and 3.5%, respectively. In the 3 patients whose pelvic peritoneum failed to be closed with simple drainage of presacral space, one developed postoperative intestinal obstruction and one had a grade C perineal wound healing.
Conclusions:
Laparoscopic sigmoid stoma through the extraperitoneal route during laparoscopic APR for rectal carcinoma is feasible and safe. It is convenient and effective to close pelvic peritoneum by using TEM intracorporeal suture technique. It is worth discussing the role of continuous irrigation of presacral space postoperatively to prevent perineal incision infection.
More Related Videos
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: