Related Experiment Videos
Controlled cardiotomy suction during clinical bubble oxygenator perfusions
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
|October 1, 1985
Summary
Controlled suction (CS) during extracorporeal circulation reduces hemolysis but does not protect platelets with bubble oxygenators. Membrane oxygenators better preserve platelets even with uncontrolled suction (US).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Hematology
Background:
- Cardiotomy suction can cause platelet damage and hemolysis through air aspiration (uncontrolled suction, US).
- Controlled suction (CS) minimizes air aspiration, reducing these adverse effects, particularly with membrane oxygenators (MO).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of controlled suction (CS) and uncontrolled suction (US) on platelet preservation and hemolysis during extracorporeal circulation using bubble oxygenators (BO) and membrane oxygenators (MO).
Main Methods:
- Patients undergoing extracorporeal circulation were divided into three groups: BO with CS (n=10), BO with US (n=8), and MO with US (n=10).
- Platelet count, ADP-induced platelet aggregation, beta-thromboglobulin levels, and blood loss were assessed.
Main Results:
- CS significantly reduced hemolysis compared to US in BO perfusions.
- Platelets were significantly better preserved with MO and US than with BO and CS, indicated by higher platelet counts, aggregation, and lower beta-thromboglobulin.
- No significant differences in blood loss or transfusion requirements were observed between the groups within 18 hours post-perfusion.
Conclusions:
- The platelet-protective benefits of CS are negated by the damaging effects of bubble oxygenators (BO).
- Membrane oxygenators (MO) offer superior platelet preservation, even with uncontrolled suction (US).
- Controlled suction (CS) effectively reduces hemolysis, irrespective of the oxygenator type.