Correlations between radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography and pathologic findings in prostatic disease

A total of 20 macroscopically normal or hypertropic prostates were taken from cadavers of men older than fifty, who died of causes other than urologic ones. The samples were studied in vitro by nonscreen x-ray films, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and then by a pathologist. There were 4 normal prostates, 12 with benign prostatic hypertrophy, 3 with carcinoma, and 1 with prostatitis. Conventional radiography which showed only prostatic calcifications was of no pathologic interest. Computed tomography is by no means of diagnostic use in distinguishing between benign prostatic hypertrophy and carcinoma, and should be used only as an alternative in the evaluation of regional extension of prostatic carcinoma. On the other hand, ultrasonography appears to be sensitive to detection of very small nonpalpable nodules. However, its specificity is poor and its use should be restricted as a guide in obtaining biopsy specimens or as a means of evaluating tumor volume.