Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

06:30
Cell Lineage Analyses and Gene Function Studies Using Twin-spot MARCM
Published on: March 2, 2017
9.4K
Genetic analysis using trans-dominant linked markers in an F2 family
C Plomion1, B H Liu, D M O'Malley
1INRA, Laboratoire de Génétique et Amélioration des Arbres Forestiers, BP45, F-33610, Cestas, France.
Summary
Trans-dominant linked marker (TDLM) pairs offer a valuable model for inferring F2 progeny genotypes. These TDLMs can substitute for co-dominant markers in quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection and gene action estimation.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Inferring F2 progeny genotypes requires understanding marker arrangement and linkage phases.
- Prior information on marker arrangement can be obtained from linkage analysis or recombinant inbred lines.
- Trans-dominant linked markers (TDLMs) present a model for genotype inference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate TDLM pairs as a substitute for co-dominant markers in genetic analyses.
- To assess the information content of TDLM pairs for quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection.
- To investigate the bias in maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) of recombination frequency.
Main Methods:
- Developed a model for inferring F2 genotypes using TDLM pairs and prior marker information.
- Applied the EM algorithm to obtain MLE of recombination frequency (r2) between TDLM pairs and co-dominant markers.
- Compared the information content of TDLM pairs with dominant and co-dominant markers.
Main Results:
- TDLM pairs can be recoded as co-dominant megaloci when recombination fraction (r1) is <0.05.
- The MLE of r2 was found to be biased, with bias increasing with r1 and r2, and decreasing with sample size.
- TDLM pairs provided substantial information content, comparable to co-dominant markers under certain conditions.
Conclusions:
- TDLM pairs can effectively substitute for co-dominant markers in genetic studies, particularly for QTL detection and gene action estimation.
- TDLM pairs offer a more accessible alternative to co-dominant markers, avoiding laborious cloning and sequencing processes.
- The TDLM model enhances genotype inference capabilities in F2 families.
Related Concept Videos
Trihybrid Crosses
24.6K
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
24.6K
Incomplete Dominance
19.2K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
19.2K
Pedigree Analysis
78.9K
Overview
78.9K
Pedigree Analysis
14.0K
14.0K
Dihybrid Crosses
61.4K
Overview
61.4K
Law of Segregation
58.2K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
58.2K

