Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K

Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.

Iring Koch1, Vera Lawo

  • 1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17-19, D-52066, Aachen, Germany, koch@psych.rwth-aachen.de.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|October 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Auditory attention settings remain stable over time, as demonstrated by a lack of temporal dissipation effects in a dichotic listening task. This study found no significant impact of the response-cue interval (RCI) on auditory switch costs.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

8.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

8.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Task switching involves cognitive control to disengage from one task and engage in another.
  • Auditory attention is crucial for processing speech and sounds in complex environments.
  • Dichotic listening tasks present competing auditory stimuli to different ears, probing selective attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the temporal dynamics of auditory attention by examining temporal dissipation effects.
  • To determine if auditory attention settings decay over time by manipulating the response-cue interval (RCI).
  • To explore the role of auditory switch costs and feature binding in a cued dichotic listening paradigm.

Main Methods:

  • A cued auditory task-switching paradigm using dichotic listening with number words spoken by different genders.
  • Manipulation of the response-cue interval (RCI) between the task cue and the auditory stimuli.
  • Measurement of auditory switch costs, comparing performance on same-task vs. task-switch trials.
  • Analysis of cue repetition benefits and the influence of stimulus location changes.

Main Results:

  • Large auditory switch costs were observed, indicating significant cognitive effort in switching between auditory tasks.
  • Cue repetition benefits were small, suggesting limited influence of immediate cue repetitions on switch costs.
  • Reduced switch costs were found when the spatial location of the auditory stimulus changed, implying episodic feature binding.
  • Crucially, no significant effect of the response-cue interval (RCI) on auditory switch costs was detected.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory attention settings are remarkably stable and do not dissipate rapidly over time.
  • The findings suggest that cognitive control mechanisms for auditory attention are robust to short temporal delays.
  • Episodic feature binding may play a role in modulating auditory task switching, independent of temporal decay.