Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Mandibular distraction in unilateral craniofacial microsomia: longitudinal results until the completion of growth
Jeongseok Suh1, Tae Hyun Choi, Seung-Hak Baek
1Seoul, Republic of Korea From Pop Plastic Surgery; the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine; the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University; and Kim Jae Chan Dentistry.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of long-term follow-up in patients with relatively severe unilateral craniofacial microsomia after mandibular distraction.
Methods:
The sample consisted of 26 patients with an average age of 6.08 years at the time of distraction. All patients had nonsyndromic unilateral craniofacial microsomia (Pruzansky-Kaban types IIA, IIB, and III). Follow-up for all patients continued until the completion of growth. The 26 clinical records and posteroanterior cephalograms of the patients, taken before distraction (time 0) and approximately 1, 4, and 11 years (time 1, time 2, and time 3, respectively) after distraction, were used. Four items (i.e., supraorbital tilting angle and occlusal tilting angle to the horizontal reference line, and maxillary and mandibular tilting angles to the vertical reference line) were analyzed at each of the four time intervals.
Results:
The overall mean distraction amount was 23 mm vertically and 21 mm horizontally. The average cephalometric follow-up was 131.7 months. In this study, the mandibular horizontal and vertical changes after distraction showed a gradual return of the asymmetry with growth in all patients. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the analyzed angles between the preoperative and final records, except for the supraorbital tilting angle.
Conclusions:
The longitudinal results achieved by distraction osteogenesis were unstable and generally led to relapse, although they were very good in the early postoperative period. Therefore, further efforts are suggested to find a solution that prevents relapse.
Clinical Question/Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic, IV.
More Related Videos
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
07:16Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023