Unified Huntington's disease rating scale for advanced patients: validation and follow-up study

Katia Youssov1, Guillaume Dolbeau, Patrick Maison

  • 1Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de référence Maladie de Huntington, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire (GHU) Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier, Créteil, France; INSERM U955, Equipe 01 Neuropsychologie interventionnelle, Créteil, France; Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut d'Etudes Cognitives, Paris, France; Université Paris Est, Faculté de Médecine, Créteil, France.

Insights

The Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-For Advanced Patients (UHDRS-FAP) is a reliable tool for assessing Huntington's disease (HD) progression. It shows greater sensitivity to change in motor and cognitive function than the original UHDRS in advanced HD patients.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Assessment
  • Neurodegenerative Diseases

Background:

  • The Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) has limitations in evaluating advanced Huntington's disease (HD) due to floor effects.
  • An adjusted scale is needed to improve the longitudinal assessment of patients with advanced HD.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design and validate the UHDRS-For Advanced Patients (UHDRS-FAP) for improved assessment of decline in advanced HD.
  • To compare the psychometric properties and sensitivity to change of the UHDRS-FAP against the original UHDRS.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty-nine advanced HD patients (Total Functional Capacity [TFC] ≤ 5) were recruited.
  • Forty-five patients underwent longitudinal assessment with UHDRS-FAP (mean 1.6 years); 30 were also assessed with UHDRS.
  • Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses evaluated psychometric properties, interrater reliability, and sensitivity to decline.

Main Results:

  • UHDRS-FAP demonstrated higher internal consistency for motor (0.84) and cognitive (0.91) scores.
  • Interrater reliability was high (≥0.88) across all UHDRS-FAP scores.
  • UHDRS-FAP was more sensitive to change, detecting decline in patients with TFC ≤ 1, unlike the UHDRS.

Conclusions:

  • The UHDRS-FAP is a reliable and more sensitive scale than the UHDRS for assessing motor and cognitive decline in advanced HD.
  • The scale includes items relevant to daily care, enhancing its clinical utility.
  • While behavioral scores showed no significant decline, this may relate to declining patient communication abilities.