Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Intranasal Administration of Recombinant Influenza Vaccines in Chimeric Mouse Models to Study Mucosal Immunity
Published on: June 25, 2015
Intranasal live attenuated seasonal influenza vaccine: does not challenge current practice
Insights
Live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccines show no clinical advantage over injected vaccines for children. These vaccines are not recommended for children at high risk of influenza complications.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Vaccinology
- Public health
Background:
- Influenza vaccination is crucial for children at risk of severe complications.
- A live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine was approved in the EU in 2012 and in the US in 2003 for children aged 2 to 17 years.
- Clinical evaluation relied on non-inferiority trials comparing it to inactivated injected vaccines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccines in children.
- To determine if intranasal vaccines offer advantages over injected vaccines, particularly for high-risk pediatric populations.
- To assess adverse events and contraindications associated with intranasal influenza vaccination.
Main Methods:
- Review of three non-inferiority clinical trials comparing intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine to injected inactivated influenza vaccine.
- Analysis of symptomatic influenza cases confirmed by viral culture.
- Assessment of clinical complications, adverse effects, and safety data from trials and US pharmacovigilance.
Main Results:
- Symptomatic influenza was less frequent with intranasal vaccine (3-5%) versus injected vaccine (6-10%).
- No significant difference in clinical complications, including asthma exacerbations, was observed.
- Adverse effects included local reactions and flu-like symptoms; wheezing and respiratory infections were higher in infants and children with severe respiratory illness, for whom the vaccine is contraindicated.
Conclusions:
- Live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccines lack demonstrated clinical advantages over injected vaccines for children.
- The intranasal vaccine is unsuitable for high-risk children, including immunocompromised individuals and those with severe respiratory conditions.
- Current evidence suggests favoring injected influenza vaccines for pediatric influenza prevention, especially in at-risk groups.
Abstract:
Influenza vaccination of children is only justified when there is a risk of serious influenza complications. In 2012, a live attenuated vaccine for intranasal administration was authorised in the European Union for influenza prevention in individuals aged from 2 to less than 18 years. This type of vaccine has been available in the United States since 2003. Clinical evaluation of this live vaccine is based on three non-inferiority trials versus an injected inactivated vaccine. There are no specific trials in children at risk of serious influenza complications. Only one of these trials was double-blinded. Two trials involved children with a history of respiratory problems. Symptomatic influenza confirmed by viral culture was less frequent in these three trials after intranasal vaccination than after injection of the conventional vaccine (about 3 to 5% and 6 to 10%, respectively). There was no difference between the vaccines in terms of clinical complications of influenza, especially asthma exacerbations. Adverse effects attributed to the intranasal vaccine mainly consisted of local reactions such as rhinorrhoea and nasal congestion, as well as flu-like syndromes. Wheezing, respiratory tract infections and hospitalisation were more frequent with the intranasal vaccine than with the injected vaccine in children aged less than 1 year and in children with a history of severe respiratory illness. The intranasal vaccine is contraindicated in these children. The intranasal vaccine contains live attenuated virus strains and is therefore contraindicated in immunocompromised patients. US pharmacovigilance data suggest that severe allergic reactions to the intranasal vaccine, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and transmission of vaccine viruses to contacts are very rare. Intranasal administration seems to be more practical, especially for children. In practice, there is no firm evidence that this live attenuated influenza vaccine has any clinical advantages over injected vaccines, including in children at risk of influenza complications. In addition, this vaccine is unsuitable for the very children who are most in need of protection against influenza. It is better to stick with injected influenza vaccines.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Influenza
Vaccinations

