Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

09:44
Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
Published on: October 20, 2011
17.4K
Fluoride release/uptake from different orthodontic adhesives: a 30-month longitudinal study
Rogério Lacerda dos Santos1, Matheus Melo Pithon, Aline Birra Nolasco Fernandes
1Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, UFCG - Federal University of Campina Grande, PatosPB, Brazil.
Brazilian Dental Journal
|November 1, 2013
Summary
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) and composites show varying long-term fluoride release. Fuji Ortho Band RMGIC and Quick-Cure composite demonstrated superior fluoride release and recharge capacity, rejecting the null hypothesis.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Polymer Chemistry
Background:
- Dental adhesives play a crucial role in restorative dentistry.
- Understanding fluoride release from dental materials is vital for caries prevention.
- Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) and composites are widely used restorative materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the long-term fluoride release of different RMGICs and composite materials.
- To test the null hypothesis of no difference in fluoride release between RMGICs and composites over time.
- To assess the fluoride ion uptake and re-release capabilities of these dental adhesives.
Main Methods:
- Five groups of dental materials were tested: Transbond XT (non-fluoride composite), Quick-Cure (fluoride composite), and three RMGICs (Fuji Ortho LC, Fuji Ortho Band, Multi-Cure).
- Fluoride release was measured at multiple time points from 1 hour up to 30 months using selective ion electrodes.
- Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni correction.
Main Results:
- Fuji Ortho Band (RMGIC) showed significantly higher fluoride release compared to other adhesives (p=0.01).
- Fuji Ortho LC and Multi-Cure (RMGICs) exhibited similar long-term performance (p>0.05).
- Quick-Cure (composite) demonstrated significant fluoride ion uptake and re-release capacity (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
- The null hypothesis was rejected, indicating significant differences in fluoride release between the tested materials.
- Fuji Ortho Band RMGIC and Quick-Cure composite exhibit superior fluoride release and recharge potential.
- These findings highlight the importance of material selection for enhanced caries prevention through fluoride release.

