You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: May 6, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
1, Rua Dona Mariana 65, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
This article discusses the use of a transareolar incision in breast augmentation surgery. The transareolar approach involves making an incision along the natural border of the areola to implant silicone prostheses. This method is suggested to provide better aesthetic results and reduce visible scarring compared to traditional techniques. The incision allows for adequate tissue undermining and good hemostasis during the procedure. Early manipulation of the implant is proposed to decrease the formation of a capsule around the implant. The absence of an inframammary scar is suggested to improve tissue healing and patient satisfaction. The study concludes that the transareolar incision may be a viable alternative to traditional methods in augmentation mammaplasty.
Area of Science:
Background:
Prior research has shown that early attempts to correct hypoplastic breasts often led to unsatisfactory outcomes, causing patient apprehension about augmentation mammaplasty. Established knowledge indicates that patients were hesitant due to concerns about potential complications. It was already known that surgical interventions carried risks, but specific outcomes remained uncertain. This gap motivated exploration of safer and more effective surgical approaches. No prior work had resolved the issue of visible scarring and tissue weakness following breast augmentation. That uncertainty drove the search for alternative incision techniques. The need for a method that minimized scarring while preserving tissue integrity became evident. Researchers aimed to address these concerns through innovative surgical approaches.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this work is to evaluate the transareolar incision as a method for augmentation mammaplasty. The specific problem addressed is the fear of visible scarring and tissue complications following breast augmentation. This study seeks to determine if this incision technique reduces postoperative complications. The motivation stems from the desire to improve patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes. The transareolar approach was proposed as a solution to minimize scarring and tissue damage. Researchers wanted to assess whether this method could provide better aesthetic results. The goal was to compare this approach with traditional techniques in terms of safety and effectiveness. The study aimed to confirm whether the transareolar incision could reduce capsule formation.
Main Methods:
The transareolar incision was used to implant silicone prostheses in patients undergoing augmentation mammaplasty. The incision was placed along the natural border of the areola to avoid visible scarring. The technique involved careful undermining of tissues to accommodate the implant. Hemostasis was achieved through meticulous control of bleeding during the procedure. Early manipulation of the implant was performed to encourage proper positioning. The absence of an inframammary scar was considered a key advantage of this method. Researchers monitored patients for signs of capsule formation and other complications. The study focused on evaluating aesthetic outcomes and postoperative recovery.
Main Results:
The transareolar incision provided acceptable aesthetic results in augmentation mammaplasty cases. Silicone implants placed through this incision showed fewer visible scars compared to other methods. Early manipulation of the implant reduced the likelihood of capsule formation. Patients reported higher satisfaction with the appearance of their breasts. The absence of an inframammary scar contributed to better tissue healing. Hemostasis was effectively managed during the procedure. The study found that this approach allowed for adequate undermining of tissues. The transareolar technique was associated with fewer complications in the early postoperative period.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that the transareolar incision is a physiologic and aesthetically favorable method for augmentation mammaplasty. This approach allows for adequate undermining and good hemostasis during implantation. The absence of an inframammary scar is suggested to improve patient satisfaction. Early manipulation of the implant is proposed to reduce capsule formation. The study suggests that this technique may decrease postoperative complications. Researchers propose that the transareolar incision is a viable alternative to traditional methods. The findings suggest that this approach may provide better aesthetic outcomes. The authors suggest that this technique could be widely adopted in clinical practice.
The transareolar incision is proposed to provide acceptable aesthetic results and reduce visible scarring.
Early manipulation of the implant through this incision is suggested to decrease capsule formation.
The lack of an inframammary scar is proposed to prevent tissue weakness and improve healing.
Hemostasis is achieved through meticulous control during implantation, reducing postoperative complications.
This incision is proposed to provide better aesthetic results and fewer visible scars compared to traditional methods.
The authors suggest this technique may be widely adopted due to its physiologic and aesthetic benefits.