Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

767
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
767
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

220.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
220.3K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

52.1K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
52.1K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

57.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.2K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

3.8K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
3.8K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

12.1K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
12.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Training AI to Improve Distinction of Triple-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer from Cysts and Fibroadenomas on Ultrasound.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

How data can help to guide NIH funding policy.

Nature·2026
Same author

A new interpretation for oxygen atom-transfer reactions for the Berg-Holm Oxomolybdenum enzyme model: Evidence for a highly active oxygen atom transfer acceptor.

Journal of inorganic biochemistry·2025
Same author

Impoundment of funds endangers US investment in science and medical research.

Nature·2025
Same author

Susanne M. Gollin, PhD, Sept 22, 1953-April 6, 2025.

Genes, chromosomes & cancer·2025
Same author

Screening for Breast Cancer with Contrast-enhanced Mammography as an Alternative to MRI: SCEMAM Trial Results.

Radiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Scientific approaches to science policy.

Jeremy M Berg1

  • 1Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Molecular Biology of the Cell
|November 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Data analysis of National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) grants reveals insights into research productivity and funding. This analysis can inform policies for a more sustainable biomedical research enterprise.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research
  • Science policy
  • Research administration

Background:

  • Robust science policy requires data-driven insights and diverse input.
  • Effective policy development necessitates rigorous analysis of available data.
  • The National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) supports biomedical research training and initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze training time distribution among new NIGMS grantees.
  • To examine the relationship between National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding and publication output.
  • To assess the predictive power of peer-review scores on scientific productivity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized available data and emerging analytical tools.
  • Analyzed training time data for NIGMS grantees.

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.9K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.9K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

7.7K
  • Correlated NIH funding levels with investigator publication records.
  • Evaluated peer-review scores against subsequent research productivity.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified patterns in training time distribution for new researchers.
    • Demonstrated a relationship between research funding and scientific output.
    • Assessed the predictive validity of peer-review scores for future productivity.

    Conclusions:

    • Rigorous data analysis is crucial for informed science policy.
    • Findings can guide reforms to enhance the sustainability of the American biomedical research enterprise.
    • Data-driven approaches are essential for optimizing research funding and productivity.