Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Monitoring Stub1-Mediated Pexophagy
Published on: May 12, 2023
Mode of action framework analysis for receptor-mediated toxicity: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
J Christopher Corton1, Michael L Cunningham, B Timothy Hummer
1US Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park, NC , USA .
Abstract:
Several therapeutic agents and industrial chemicals induce liver tumors in rodents through the activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). The cellular and molecular events by which PPARα activators induce rodent hepatocarcinogenesis has been extensively studied and elucidated. This review summarizes the weight of evidence relevant to the hypothesized mode of action (MOA) for PPARα activator-induced rodent hepatocarcinogenesis and identifies gaps in our knowledge of this MOA. Chemical-specific and mechanistic data support concordance of temporal and dose-response relationships for the key events associated with many PPARα activators including a phthalate ester plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and the drug gemfibrozil. While biologically plausible in humans, the hypothesized key events in the rodent MOA, for PPARα activators, are unlikely to induce liver tumors in humans because of toxicodynamic and biological differences in responses. This conclusion is based on minimal or no effects observed on growth pathways, hepatocellular proliferation and liver tumors in humans and/or species (including hamsters, guinea pigs and cynomolgous monkeys) that are more appropriate human surrogates than mice and rats at overlapping dose levels. Overall, the panel concluded that significant quantitative differences in PPARα activator-induced effects related to liver cancer formation exist between rodents and humans. On the basis of these quantitative differences, most of the workgroup felt that the rodent MOA is "not relevant to humans" with the remaining members concluding that the MOA is "unlikely to be relevant to humans". The two groups differed in their level of confidence based on perceived limitations of the quantitative and mechanistic knowledge of the species differences, which for some panel members strongly supports but cannot preclude the absence of effects under unlikely exposure scenarios.
Insights
PPARα (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha) activators cause liver tumors in rodents. However, the mode of action is unlikely to be relevant to humans due to significant species differences in toxicodynamics and biological responses.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Hepatocarcinogenesis
- Receptor Biology
Background:
- Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activators are known to induce liver tumors in rodents.
- The mechanisms underlying PPARα activator-induced rodent hepatocarcinogenesis have been extensively studied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence for the mode of action (MOA) of PPARα activator-induced rodent hepatocarcinogenesis.
- To identify knowledge gaps in this MOA.
- To assess the relevance of the rodent MOA to humans.
Main Methods:
- Review of chemical-specific and mechanistic data for PPARα activators.
- Comparison of temporal and dose-response relationships in rodents and human surrogate species.
- Evaluation of toxicodynamic and biological differences between rodents and humans.
Main Results:
- Data support concordance of key events for PPARα activators like DEHP and gemfibrozil in rodents.
- Biologically plausible MOA events in rodents are unlikely to induce liver tumors in humans.
- Human surrogate species show minimal or no effects on growth pathways, hepatocellular proliferation, and liver tumors at relevant doses.
Conclusions:
- Significant quantitative differences exist in PPARα activator-induced liver cancer formation between rodents and humans.
- The rodent MOA for PPARα activator-induced hepatocarcinogenesis is considered "not relevant" or "unlikely to be relevant" to humans.
- Differences in confidence levels among experts stem from perceived limitations in understanding species-specific quantitative and mechanistic data.
More Related Videos
05:27Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication: A Functional Biomarker to Assess Adverse Effects of Toxicants and Toxins, and Health Benefits of Natural Products
Published on: December 25, 2016
10:51Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists
Published on: November 15, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors
About 48 different soluble family members of nuclear receptors are identified that can be divided into two main classes:
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
Peroxisomes
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue....
Drug Metabolism: Phase I Reactions
Signal Transduction: Overview
Typically, signal transduction involves three...