Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

1.8K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
1.8K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

7.0K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
7.0K
Construction of Frequency Distribution01:15

Construction of Frequency Distribution

10.0K
A frequency distribution table can be constructed using the steps given below.
First, make a table with two columns—one with the title of the data that needs to be organized, and the other column for frequency. [Draw a third column for tally marks if needed]. Then, take a look at the items given in the data set and decide if an ungrouped frequency distribution table or a grouped frequency distribution table would be more suitable. If there are large sets of different values, then it is...
10.0K
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain01:26

Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain

505
Linear systems are characterized by two main properties: superposition and homogeneity. Superposition allows the response to multiple inputs to be the sum of the responses to each individual input. Homogeneity ensures that scaling an input by a scalar results in the response being scaled by the same scalar.
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
505
Mean From a Frequency Distribution01:11

Mean From a Frequency Distribution

18.0K
Sometimes, data gathered from an experiment on a large sample or population are organized into concise tables. In such cases, the frequency of the quantitative data set is plotted in the form of a table. Or else, the data values are grouped into the quantity’s intervals, which form classes, and their respective frequencies are known. That is, the data values are distributed over different categories or classes. This is known as frequency distribution.
When such a data set is encountered,...
18.0K
Relative Frequency Distribution00:55

Relative Frequency Distribution

9.7K
A relative frequency distribution is the proportion or fraction of times a value occurs in a data set. To find the relative frequencies, one can divide each frequency by the total number of data points in the sample. It is very similar to a regular frequency distribution, except that instead of reporting how many data values fall in a class, a relative frequency distribution reports the fraction of data values that fall in a class. These fractions or proportions are called relative frequencies...
9.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Binaural Front End for Speech Intelligibility Models: Application to the Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI).

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Modeling the Relationship Between Listener Factors and Envelope Fidelity: A Pooled Analysis Spanning a Decade.

Ear and hearing·2025
Same author

Binaural speech intelligibility for combinations of noise, reverberation, and hearing-aid signal processing.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Extending the Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI): Keywords, sentences, and context.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

An overview of the HASPI and HASQI metrics for predicting speech intelligibility and speech quality for normal hearing, hearing loss, and hearing aids.

Hearing research·2022
Same author

A comparison of speech intelligibility and subjective quality with hearing-aid processing in older adults with hearing loss.

International journal of audiology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

977

Improved estimation of frequency importance functions.

James M Kates1

  • 1Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, 2501 Kittredge Loop Road 409 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 James.Kates@colorado.edu.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|November 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a streamlined method for calculating the speech importance function, crucial for estimating speech intelligibility (SII). The new approach simplifies the process using direct nonlinear optimization from intelligibility data.

More Related Videos

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

10.5K
STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces
05:36

STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2026

146

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

977
Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

10.5K
STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces
05:36

STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2026

146

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Speech Science
  • Acoustics

Background:

  • The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) quantifies speech understanding based on audibility across frequencies.
  • The frequency importance function (FIF) is key to SII, detailing frequency-specific contributions.
  • Current FIF estimation involves complex, multi-step procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more direct and efficient method for computing the frequency importance function.
  • To simplify the estimation of speech intelligibility metrics.

Main Methods:

  • A novel procedure for direct computation of the frequency importance function from intelligibility data.
  • Utilizing nonlinear joint optimization of the FIF and SII curve-fitting parameters.
  • Application to previously published W-22 word list intelligibility data.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a direct calculation of the frequency importance function.
  • Successfully applied the new method to existing intelligibility data.
  • The new procedure offers a simplified alternative to traditional multi-step methods.

Conclusions:

  • The presented method simplifies the computation of the frequency importance function.
  • This advancement facilitates more direct estimation of speech intelligibility.
  • The approach offers a valuable tool for audiology and speech research.