Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.7K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.8K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.8K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

37.0K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.0K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

1.1K
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
1.1K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.5K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.5K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

1.1K
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

You cannot just count: A statistical rethinking of semantic richness in free-generation tasks and semantic norms.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Correlations without causation do not support claims of human-LLM reasoning alignment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

An Agent-Based Model of Semantic Memory Search: Disentangling Cognitive Control and Semantic Space Organization.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Towards scalable and reliable coding of semantic property norms: ChatGPT vs. an improved AC-PLT.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

13.6K

Inference and coherence in causal-based artifact categorization.

Guillermo Puebla1, Sergio E Chaigneau

  • 1Universidad de Tarapacá, General Velásquez 1775, Arica, Chile.

Cognition
|November 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Participants use coherence in artifact categorization when information is incomplete. When all artifact properties are known, categorization relies on individual features, not coherence.

Keywords:
ArtifactsCausal inferenceCausal-based categorizationCoherence effectEssentialism

More Related Videos

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
05:35

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization

Published on: April 19, 2017

6.1K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

13.6K
Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
05:35

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization

Published on: April 19, 2017

6.1K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Concept Formation
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Understanding how humans categorize artifacts is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has debated the role of coherence versus specific properties in artifact categorization.
  • The influence of incomplete information on categorization strategies remains an open question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which artifact concepts support inference and coherence in causal categorization.
  • To determine which artifact properties (design history, structure, intention, action, outcome) are most influential.
  • To explore whether humans utilize coherence when information is missing.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using systematic variation of artifact properties (intact, compromised, unobserved).
  • Participants categorized scenarios with manipulated information completeness regarding design history, physical structure, user intention, user action, and functional outcome.
  • Behavioral data was analyzed to assess categorization strategies and reliance on coherence.

Main Results:

  • When all artifact information was complete, participants categorized based on individual properties, not coherence.
  • When some artifact property information was unobserved, participants inferred missing states, increasing the utility of available data for categorization.
  • This suggests a shift towards inferential reasoning and coherence-based strategies under uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Artifact categorization strategies are sensitive to information completeness.
  • Humans employ inferential reasoning to maintain coherence when faced with missing information about artifact properties.
  • The study provides insights into the causal models underlying artifact concepts and the relative importance of different properties.