Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Accurate and Phenol Free DNA Sexing of Day 30 Porcine Embryos by PCR
Published on: February 14, 2016
Gametic imprinting effects on rate and composition of pig growth
1DLO-Research Institute for Animal Production "Schoonoord" (IVO-DLO), P.O. Box 501, 3700, AM, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Genetic improvement schemes in livestock are based on the assumption that the expression of relevant genes is independent of parent of origin. Until now no evidence has been found to reject this assumption. The present study on three purebred pig populations, however, shows that a significant proportion of the phenotypic variance in backfat thickness (5-7%) can be explained by genes subject to paternal imprinting. The implication is that there are genes affecting backfat that are expressed only when derived from the paternal gamete. Paternal imprinted effects explained 1-4% of the phenotypic variation for growth rate. Maternal imprinted effects were heavily confounded with heritable maternal environmental effects. When modelled separately, these effects explained 2-5% and 3-4% of the phenotypic variance in backfat thickness and growth rate, respectively. Gametic imprinting may have consequences for the optimization of breeding programmes, especially in crossbreeding systems with specialized sire and dam lines.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
Imprinting
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...

