Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

718
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
718
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

8.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.8K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

606
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
606
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.4K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.6K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Iron supplementation and paediatric HIV disease progression: a cohort study among children receiving routine HIV care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

International journal of epidemiology·2022
Same author

Diet- and Lifestyle-Based Prediction Models to Estimate Cancer Recurrence and Death in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer (CALGB 89803/Alliance).

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2022
Same author

A Bayesian approach for estimating the partial potential impact fraction with exposure measurement error under a main study/internal validation design.

Statistical methods in medical research·2021
Same author

swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2021
Same author

Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method.

BMC medical research methodology·2021
Same author

Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.

American journal of preventive medicine·2021
Same journal

Comparing Adaptive Interventions under a General Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design via Multiple Comparisons with the Best.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2026
Same journal

Variable Selection in Ultra-high Dimensional Feature Space for the Cox Model with Interval-Censored Data.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2026
Same journal

On semi-supervised estimation using exponential tilt mixture models.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2025
Same journal

Regression-Assisted Bayesian Record Linkage for Causal Inference in Observational Studies with Covariates Spread Over Two Files.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2024
Same journal

Efficient inference of parent-of-origin effect using case-control mother-child genotype data.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2024
Same journal

Distributed eQTL analysis with auxiliary information.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.0K

Can efficiency be gained by correcting for misclassification?

Molin Wang1, Xiaomei Liao, Donna Spiegelman

  • 1Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA ; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA ; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
|November 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The inverse matrix method can offer a more efficient odds ratio estimator than the naive method in case-control studies with exposure misclassification. This correction can lead to more precise estimates and narrower confidence intervals.

Keywords:
2×2 tableCase control studyMisclassificationOdds ratioValidation study design

More Related Videos

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.0K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Case-control studies are susceptible to exposure misclassification bias.
  • Binary exposure misclassification can distort odds ratio (OR) estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficiency of the inverse matrix method for OR estimation under exposure misclassification.
  • To determine conditions where the inverse matrix method outperforms the naive estimator.
  • To provide a formula for minimum validation study size for improved efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 2x2 tables from case-control studies.
  • Comparison of naive OR estimator with the inverse matrix method.
  • Derivation of a formula for validation study sample size.

Main Results:

  • The inverse matrix method can yield a more efficient OR estimator than the naive method.
  • A formula is provided to calculate the minimum validation study size for improved efficiency.
  • Correcting for misclassification can enhance efficiency and consistency of OR estimates.

Conclusions:

  • The inverse matrix method offers a statistically advantageous approach to handling exposure misclassification in case-control studies.
  • Correcting for misclassification does not inherently widen confidence intervals and can improve estimator efficiency.
  • Validation studies are crucial for ensuring the benefits of misclassification correction.