Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
9.2K
Attention, predictive learning, and the inverse base-rate effect: evidence from event-related potentials
Andy J Wills1, Aureliu Lavric2, Yvonne Hemmings2
1School of Psychology, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
Neuroimage
|November 6, 2013
Summary
This study reveals how the brain processes predictive learning biases. We found that attention, not just symptom frequency, drives the inverse base-rate effect (IBRE), impacting decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
- Learning and Memory
Background:
- The inverse base-rate effect (IBRE) is a non-rational bias in predictive learning where individuals make decisions contrary to base rates.
- Existing theories suggest error-driven attention drives the IBRE, with shared cues attracting more attention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct the first electrophysiological investigation of the inverse base-rate effect (IBRE).
- To test the prediction that error-driven attention theories explain the IBRE by examining brain potentials.
- To differentiate attentional explanations from alternative accounts like novelty or response accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Electrophysiological recordings (Selection Negativity and Selection Positivity) were used to measure brain activity during a predictive learning task.
- Participants learned symptom-disease associations with varying base rates.
- Control conditions with matched frequencies but no shared symptoms were included.
Main Results:
- Brain potentials associated with visual attention (posterior Selection Negativity, anterior Selection Positivity) were observed for the more frequently predicted symptom (C) compared to the less frequently predicted symptom (B).
- These attentional effects and the IBRE were absent in control conditions without shared symptoms.
- Response accuracy was higher for B than for C, dissociating accuracy from attentional allocation.
Conclusions:
- Electrophysiological evidence supports error-driven attention theories in explaining the inverse base-rate effect.
- Attentional allocation, specifically to shared cues, is a key mechanism underlying the IBRE.
- The findings distinguish attentional mechanisms from other potential explanations for this learning bias.

