Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

12:08
The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
Published on: April 22, 2020
8.7K
Comparing test cultivars using reliability functions of test-check differences from on-farm trials
K M Eskridge1, O S Smith, P F Byrne
1Department of Biometry, University of Nebraska, 68583-0712, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Summary
This study introduces reliability functions to assess how well new crop varieties perform against established ones. These functions help identify superior varieties and predict their success across different environments.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Plant Breeding
- Biometrics
Background:
- Traditional crop breeding relies on statistical analysis of trial data.
- Evaluating cultivar performance across diverse environments is crucial for successful crop development.
- Predicting cultivar success in future, unseen environments remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel selection approach using reliability functions.
- To evaluate the utility of reliability functions for comparing test cultivars against checks.
- To identify cultivar performance characteristics like stability and similarity to checks.
Main Methods:
- Developed a selection method based on probabilities of a test cultivar outperforming a check by a specified amount (d).
- Defined the reliability function as the probability of outperformance for all values of d.
- Applied the method to on-farm maize (Zea mays L.) strip trial data.
Main Results:
- Reliability functions effectively evaluate test cultivar performance relative to checks across environments.
- The location, slope, and shape of reliability functions characterize cultivar performance, similarity, and stability.
- Identified specific environments where test cultivars exhibited performance issues.
Conclusions:
- Reliability functions offer a robust tool for cultivar selection and performance evaluation.
- This approach enhances the understanding of cultivar behavior across varying environmental conditions.
- The method aids in identifying promising cultivars and potential environmental limitations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.5K
Significance Testing: Overview
10.2K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
10.2K
Reliability and Validity
12.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.9K
Types of Hypothesis Testing
28.1K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
28.1K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
5.8K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
5.8K
Test for Homogeneity
1.7K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
1.7K

