Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.8K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.8K
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

2.0K
The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
2.0K
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs01:19

Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs

3.5K
Following these guidelines can help nurses accurately measure vital signs, assess changes in patient conditions, and provide timely treatment when necessary. Adhering closely to the guidelines ensures the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
3.5K
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

1.5K
The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
1.5K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

1.2K
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
1.2K
Legal Guidelines for Documentation01:06

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

2.5K
The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal trends in patient demographics and postoperative outcomes in metabolic and bariatric surgery: a longitudinal analysis of the MBSAQIP database in the GLP-1 era.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery·2026
Same author

Differences in utilization and outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy in patients with class IV obesity: a retrospective cohort analysis of the NSQIP database.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Training benchmarks for the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery virtual reality tasks.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Balancing Efficiency and Equity in the Operating Room.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

Upper arm administration is associated with higher injection site pain with romosozumab: a randomized controlled trial and a self-controlled study.

JBMR plus·2026
Same author

Preoperative GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Weight Loss Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

How do SAGES members rate its guidelines?

William W Hope1, William Richardson, Robert Fanelli

  • 1Department of Surgery, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC, USA.

Surgical Endoscopy
|November 8, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines are highly valued by clinicians. Recent improvements to guideline development and dissemination have been successful, according to end-user feedback.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research
07:25

Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research

Published on: October 13, 2023

7.2K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research
07:25

Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research

Published on: October 13, 2023

7.2K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Practice Guidelines
  • End-User Feedback Analysis
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Practice guideline development necessitates incorporating end-user perspectives.
  • The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has refined its guideline processes based on prior feedback.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To gather end-user feedback on existing SAGES guidelines.
  • To identify areas for improvement and new guideline topics.

Main Methods:

  • An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to assess 26 SAGES guidelines.
  • The survey included a 32-item questionnaire and solicited suggestions for new guidelines.

Main Results:

  • 494 responses were received, predominantly from clinicians (96%) and surgeons (75%).
  • 81% of respondents had used the guidelines, with 96% agreeing with their content.
  • Guideline quality (4.34), value (4.27), and access (3.97) were rated highly on a 5-point scale.

Conclusions:

  • End-users overwhelmingly value and agree with SAGES guidelines.
  • The findings confirm the success of recent initiatives to enhance guideline quality and utility.