Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Semantic similarity between sentences.

R P Honeck1

  • 1Psychology Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
|November 8, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

394
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
394
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

974
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
974
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.5K
Synaptic Signaling01:09

Synaptic Signaling

5.7K
Neurons communicate at synapses, or junctions, to excite or inhibit the activity of other neurons or target cells, such as muscles. Synapses may be chemical or electrical.
Most synapses are chemical, meaning an electrical impulse or action potential spurs the release of chemical messengers called neurotransmitters. The neuron sending the signal is called the presynaptic neuron, and the neuron receiving the signal is the postsynaptic neuron.
The presynaptic neuron fires an action potential that...
5.7K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

2.6K
2.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.6K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Semantic memory for metaphor: The conceptual base hypothesis.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Ear differences in the recall of monaurally presented sentences.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology·1973
Same journal

Cognitive Individual Differences in Multilingualism: Language Aptitude and Working Memory in L3 Learners.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Grasp Motor Representations Facilitate Conceptual Preparation in Speech Production.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

The Lexical Tone Partially Depends on Segments: Evidence from Visual-World Eye Tracking.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Unearthing Perfectionism and L2 Speaking Performance among Iranian EFL Learners: The Moderating Role of Cultural Collectivism.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Child Bilingual Acquisition of Spanish Dative (Non-)clitic Doubling Structures: A Case Study Approach to Home and Community Input Conditions.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Using Eye Tracking to Examine Effects of Overt Localization on Referential Processing in German Sign Language Sentence Processing.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
See all related articles

Deep sentence structure significantly impacts semantic similarity judgments, more than lexical or surface changes. Additional factors like propositional and semantic structure are also crucial for a full understanding.

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Understanding sentence semantic similarity is key to natural language processing and human comprehension.
  • Previous research has explored various linguistic features influencing similarity judgments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential effects of deep, lexical, and surface sentence structures on perceived semantic similarity.
  • To establish a hierarchy of linguistic factors influencing semantic similarity judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Generated ten sentence conditions (four paraphrases, six nonparaphrases) from a base sentence.
  • Utilized transformational, lexical, formalexical, and parasyntactic paraphrases.
  • Employed a modified paired comparisons task to collect similarity judgments.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Main Results:

  • Established a preference order: transformational > lexical > formalexical > parasyntactic > false permutation > false synonymous > unrelated.
  • Demonstrated potent effects of deep structure similarity on judgments.
  • Indicated that surface and lexical factors also play a role, but to a lesser extent.

Conclusions:

  • Deep structure similarity is a primary driver of semantic similarity perception.
  • Additional factors, including propositional and semantic structure, are necessary for a comprehensive model.
  • Findings inform computational linguistics and theories of language understanding.