Selective attention in cerebral palsied and normal children
D P Hallahan1, S Stainback, D W Ball
1Department of Special Education, University of Virginia, 22903, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
|November 8, 2013
Summary
Children with cerebral palsy and intellectual disability showed normal selective attention abilities. Attention efficiency improved with mental age (MA) in both groups, highlighting MA as key for attention performance.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Child Psychology
Background:
- Selective attention is crucial for cognitive development.
- Previous research has yielded mixed results on attention deficits in children with cerebral palsy and intellectual disability.
- The impact of institutionalization on cognitive functions, including attention, requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare selective attention abilities in children with spastic cerebral palsy and intellectual disability against normal MA controls.
- To determine the influence of mental age (MA), chronological age, and IQ on selective attention performance.
- To examine the effects of institutionalization on attention and discuss the impact of brain damage and intellectual disability.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of noninstitutionalized, educable, intellectually disabled, spastic cerebral palsied children at two MA levels with normal MA controls.
- Assessment of selective attention using a standardized task.
- Analysis of performance based on MA, chronological age, and IQ.
Main Results:
- Children with cerebral palsy and intellectual disability did not exhibit deficits in selective attention compared to normal MA controls.
- Selective attention efficiency increased with higher MA in both cerebral palsied and normal children.
- Results indicated MA is a more significant factor in selective attention than chronological age or IQ.
Conclusions:
- Mental age, not chronological age or IQ, is the primary determinant of selective attention performance in children.
- The findings do not support attention-deficit theories for these populations.
- Institutionalization appears to negatively affect attention abilities, whereas brain damage and intellectual disability do not inherently cause selective attention deficits.


