Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Thoracic Spinal Cord Hemisection Surgery and Open-Field Locomotor Assessment in the Rat
Published on: June 26, 2019
A new method to assess weight-bearing distribution after central nervous system lesions in rats
Vincent Pertici1, Caroline Pin-Barre2, Marie-Solenne Felix1
1Aix-Marseille Université (AMU) et Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 7287 «Institut des Sciences du Mouvement (ISM): Etienne-Jules MAREY», Equipe «Plasticité des Systèmes Nerveux et Musculaire» (PSNM), Parc Scientifique et Technologique de Luminy, Faculté des Sciences du Sport de Marseille, CC910 - 163 Avenue de Luminy, F-13288 Marseille cedex 09, France.
Abstract:
The aim of the present study is to assess the relevance of weight-bearing distribution (DWB) measurement in freely moving rats after stroke and thoracic spinal cord injuries. Animals were divided in 2 experiments: (1) The middle cerebral artery occlusion-reperfusion (MCAO-r) experiment containing the MCAO group in which focal brain ischaemia was induced by transient MCA occlusion and (2) the thoracic hemisection experiment containing the TH group in which a spinal cord hemisection was performed at the T10 level. A Control and respective Sham groups were also included in each experiment. Not only the pressure exerted by each paw was measured but also different ratios such as: (1) the sum of the right and the left forepaws was normalized by the sum of the right and the left hindpaws (F/H), (2) the left forepaw was normalized by the right forepaw (LF/RF), (3) the left hindpaw was normalized by the right hindpaw (LH/RH). Additionally, the times spent on 3 paws and on 4 paws were measured. Only the time spent on 4 paws was shorter in the MCAO group than in the Control (p<0.001) and in the Sham (p<0.01) groups. The LH/RH ratio of the TH group at the 1st week was lower (p<0.01) than the pre-surgical value. Moreover, its F/H ratio was superior (p<0.001) to the ones of the Control and the Sham groups. Our study indicates that DWB should be more frequently used to evaluate both the severity of central nervous system traumas and the effectiveness of pharmacological and/or rehabilitation strategies.

